» Articles » PMID: 25071986

A Complete, Multi-level Conformational Clustering of Antibody Complementarity-determining Regions

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2014 Jul 30
PMID 25071986
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classification of antibody complementarity-determining region (CDR) conformations is an important step that drives antibody modelling and engineering, prediction from sequence, directed mutagenesis and induced-fit studies, and allows inferences on sequence-to-structure relations. Most of the previous work performed conformational clustering on a reduced set of structures or after application of various structure pre-filtering criteria. In this study, it was judged that a clustering of every available CDR conformation would produce a complete and redundant repertoire, increase the number of sequence examples and allow better decisions on structure validity in the future. In order to cope with the potential increase in data noise, a first-level statistical clustering was performed using structure superposition Root-Mean-Square Deviation (RMSD) as a distance-criterion, coupled with second- and third-level clustering that employed Ramachandran regions for a deeper qualitative classification. The classification of a total of 12,712 CDR conformations is thus presented, along with rich annotation and cluster descriptions, and the results are compared to previous major studies. The present repertoire has procured an improved image of our current CDR Knowledge-Base, with a novel nesting of conformational sensitivity and specificity that can serve as a systematic framework for improved prediction from sequence as well as a number of future studies that would aid in knowledge-based antibody engineering such as humanisation.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Functional Landscape of the p53 Regulatory Domain: The Stabilizing Role of Post-Translational Modifications.

Bakker M, Svensson O, So Rensen H, Skepo M J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(14):5842-5853.

PMID: 38973087 PMC: 11270737. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00570.


Antibody Clustering Using a Machine Learning Pipeline that Fuses Genetic, Structural, and Physicochemical Properties.

Papageorgiou L, Maroulis D, Chrousos G, Eliopoulos E, Vlachakis D Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1194:41-58.

PMID: 32468522 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32622-7_4.


Length-independent structural similarities enrich the antibody CDR canonical class model.

Nowak J, Baker T, Georges G, Kelm S, Klostermann S, Shi J MAbs. 2016; 8(4):751-60.

PMID: 26963563 PMC: 4966832. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1158370.


PyIgClassify: a database of antibody CDR structural classifications.

Adolf-Bryfogle J, Xu Q, North B, Lehmann A, Dunbrack Jr R Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D432-8.

PMID: 25392411 PMC: 4383924. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1106.


Disjoint combinations profiling (DCP): a new method for the prediction of antibody CDR conformation from sequence.

Nikoloudis D, Pitts J, Saldanha J PeerJ. 2014; 2:e455.

PMID: 25071985 PMC: 4103075. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.455.

References
1.
Chothia C, Lesk A, Tramontano A, Levitt M, AIR G, Sheriff S . Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature. 1989; 342(6252):877-83. DOI: 10.1038/342877a0. View

2.
North B, Lehmann A, Dunbrack Jr R . A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. J Mol Biol. 2010; 406(2):228-56. PMC: 3065967. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030. View

3.
Guex N, Peitsch M . SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1998; 18(15):2714-23. DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150181505. View

4.
Guarne A, Bravo J, Calvo J, Lozano F, Vives J, Fita I . Conformation of the hypervariable region L3 without the key proline residue. Protein Sci. 1996; 5(1):167-9. PMC: 2143247. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050121. View

5.
Al-Lazikani B, Lesk A, Chothia C . Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. J Mol Biol. 1998; 273(4):927-48. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1354. View