» Articles » PMID: 25067909

A Simple and Cost-effective Method of DNA Extraction from Small Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue for Molecular Oncologic Testing

Overview
Journal BMC Clin Pathol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jul 29
PMID 25067909
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extraction of DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a critical step in molecular oncologic testing. As molecular oncology testing becomes more important for prognostic and therapeutic decision making and tissue specimens become smaller due to earlier detection of suspicious lesions and the use of fine needle aspiration methods for tissue collection, it becomes more challenging for the typical molecular pathology laboratory to obtain reliable test results. We developed a DNA extraction method to obtain sufficient quantity and high quality genomic DNA from limited FFPE tissue for molecular oncology testing using a combination of H&E stained slides, a matrix capture method and the Qiagen DNA column.

Methods: THREE DNA EXTRACTION METHODS WERE COMPARED: our standard procedure of manually scraping tissue from unstained slides followed by DNA extraction using the QIAamp FFPE column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), a glue capture method (Pinpoint Solution, Zymo Research Corp, Inc) on H&E stained slides followed by DNA extraction using either the QIAamp column or the column included with the Pinpoint kit (Zymo Research). The DNA extraction protocol was optimized. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired two-sample student's t-test.

Results: The combination of the matrix capture method with the QIAamp column gave an equivalent amount of DNA as our standard extraction method using the unstained slides and a 4.6-fold higher DNA yield than using the Zymo column included in the Pinpoint Slide Solution kit. Several molecular tests were performed and DNA purified using the new method gave the same results as for the previous methods.

Conclusions: Using H&E stained slides allows visual confirmation of tumor cells during microdissection. The Pinpoint solution made removal of specific tissue from the slides easier and reduced the risk of contamination and tissue loss. This DNA extraction method is simple, cost-effective, and blends with our current workflow requiring no additional equipment.

Citing Articles

Identification of a distinctive immunogenomic gene signature in stage-matched colorectal cancer.

Ahluwalia P, Mondal A, Vashisht A, Singh H, Alptekin A, Ballur K J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 151(1):9.

PMID: 39673574 PMC: 11646222. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-06034-4.


Extraction, Purification, and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Analysis of DNA and RNA from Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissue.

Hoque M, DMello V, Husain S, Soteropoulos P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2866:207-227.

PMID: 39546205 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4192-7_12.


Is the development of liquid biopsy for the early detection and the monitoring of breast cancers on its way of overtaking mammography?.

Mansour H, Nejjari C, Incitti R, Anouar N, Ouhajjou A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1415940.

PMID: 39185467 PMC: 11341495. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415940.


Analysis of Copy Number Variation of DNA Repair/Damage Response Genes in Tumor Tissues.

Izumi T Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2701:231-242.

PMID: 37574486 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3373-1_15.


Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining Helps Reduce Maternal Contamination in Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping for Hydatidiform Mole Diagnosis.

Zhao Y, Cai L, Zhang X, Zhang H, Cai L, Zhou L Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2023; 43(3):253-263.

PMID: 37566880 PMC: 11022989. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000973.


References
1.
Pikor L, Enfield K, Cameron H, Lam W . DNA extraction from paraffin embedded material for genetic and epigenetic analyses. J Vis Exp. 2011; (49). PMC: 3197328. DOI: 10.3791/2763. View

2.
Okello J, Zurek J, Devault A, Kuch M, Okwi A, Sewankambo N . Comparison of methods in the recovery of nucleic acids from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded autopsy tissues. Anal Biochem. 2010; 400(1):110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.01.014. View

3.
Hofman V, Ilie M, Gavric-Tanga V, Lespinet V, Mari M, Lassalle S . [Role of the surgical pathology laboratory in the pre-analytical approach of molecular biology techniques]. Ann Pathol. 2010; 30(2):85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2010.03.003. View

4.
Konoplev S, Yin C, Kornblau S, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Andreeff M . Molecular characterization of de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012; 54(1):138-44. PMC: 3925981. DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.701739. View

5.
Medintz I, Levine L, McCurdy L, Chiriboga L, Kingston C, Crim D . HLA-DQA1 and polymarker allele frequencies in two New York City Jewish populations. J Forensic Sci. 1997; 42(5):919-22. View