» Articles » PMID: 37566880

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining Helps Reduce Maternal Contamination in Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping for Hydatidiform Mole Diagnosis

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 11
PMID 37566880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping provides parental origin information about aneuploidy pregnancy loss and has become the current gold standard for hydatidiform mole diagnosis. STR genotyping diagnostic support most commonly relies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, but maternal contamination is one of the most common issues based on traditional unstained sections. To evaluate the influence of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on DNA quality and STR genotyping, DNA was isolated from unstained, deparaffinized hydrated, and H&E-stained tissue sections (i.e. 3 groups) from each of 6 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded placentas. The macrodissected view field, DNA quality, and polymerase chain reaction amplification efficiency were compared among groups. STR genotyping analysis was performed in both the test cohort (n = 6) and the validation cohort (n = 149). H&E staining not only did not interfere with molecular DNA testing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue but also had a clearer macrodissected field of vision. In the test cohort, H&E-stained sections were the only group that did not exhibit maternal miscellaneous peaks in STR genotyping results. In the validation cohort, 138 (92.62%) cases yielded satisfactory amplification results without maternal contamination. Thus, H&E staining helped to reduce maternal contamination in STR genotyping for hydatidiform mole diagnosis, suggesting that H&E-stained sections can be incorporated into the hydatidiform mole molecular diagnostic workflow.

References
1.
Xing D, Adams E, Huang J, Ronnett B . Refined diagnosis of hydatidiform moles with p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping: updated analysis of a prospective series of 2217 cases. Mod Pathol. 2020; 34(5):961-982. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00691-9. View

2.
Zhao Y, Huang B, Zhou L, Cai L, Qian J . Challenges in diagnosing hydatidiform moles: a review of promising molecular biomarkers. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2022; 22(8):783-796. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2022.2118050. View

3.
de Lang A, Wilander E . Sensitivity of HPV tests on stained vs. unstained cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 2006; 49(6):595-9. DOI: 10.1159/000326245. View

4.
Maisenbacher M, Merrion K, Kutteh W . Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray detects molar pregnancies in 3% of miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(4):700-706. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.015. View

5.
Shah M, Cinnioglu C, Maisenbacher M, Comstock I, Kort J, Lathi R . Comparison of cytogenetics and molecular karyotyping for chromosome testing of miscarriage specimens. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(4):1028-1033. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.022. View