» Articles » PMID: 25033736

Phenotypic Screening in Cancer Drug Discovery - Past, Present and Future

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Jul 19
PMID 25033736
Citations 161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been a resurgence of interest in the use of phenotypic screens in drug discovery as an alternative to target-focused approaches. Given that oncology is currently the most active therapeutic area, and also one in which target-focused approaches have been particularly prominent in the past two decades, we investigated the contribution of phenotypic assays to oncology drug discovery by analysing the origins of all new small-molecule cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the past 15 years and those currently in clinical development. Although the majority of these drugs originated from target-based discovery, we identified a significant number whose discovery depended on phenotypic screening approaches. We postulate that the contribution of phenotypic screening to cancer drug discovery has been hampered by a reliance on 'classical' nonspecific drug effects such as cytotoxicity and mitotic arrest, exacerbated by a paucity of mechanistically defined cellular models for therapeutically translatable cancer phenotypes. However, technical and biological advances that enable such mechanistically informed phenotypic models have the potential to empower phenotypic drug discovery in oncology.

Citing Articles

The role and application of bioinformatics techniques and tools in drug discovery.

Zhang S, Liu K, Liu Y, Hu X, Gu X Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1547131.

PMID: 40017606 PMC: 11865229. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547131.


Development of a phenotypic screening assay to measure activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Ilg M, Lapthorn A, Harding S, Minhas T, Koduri G, Bustin S Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1526495.

PMID: 40017592 PMC: 11865240. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1526495.


Advances in the Repurposing and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrance of Drugs in Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Rechberger J, Toll S, Biswas S, You H, Chow W, Kendall N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941807 PMC: 11816256. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030439.


Enantioselective Protein Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry (EAS-MS).

Wang X, Sun J, Ahmad S, Yang D, Li F, Chan U bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896675 PMC: 11785093. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.17.633682.


Metabolic engineering approaches for the biosynthesis of antibiotics.

Yook G, Nam J, Jo Y, Yoon H, Yang D Microb Cell Fact. 2025; 24(1):35.

PMID: 39891166 PMC: 11786382. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-024-02628-2.


References
1.
Prasad A, Park I, Allen H, Zhang X, Reddy M, Boominathan R . Styryl sulfonyl compounds inhibit translation of cyclin D1 in mantle cell lymphoma cells. Oncogene. 2009; 28(12):1518-28. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.502. View

2.
Arrowsmith C, Bountra C, Fish P, Lee K, Schapira M . Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012; 11(5):384-400. DOI: 10.1038/nrd3674. View

3.
Teicher B, Ara G, Herbst R, Palombella V, Adams J . The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5(9):2638-45. View

4.
Urdiales J, Morata P, Nunez de Castro I, Sanchez-Jimenez F . Antiproliferative effect of dehydrodidemnin B (DDB), a depsipeptide isolated from Mediterranean tunicates. Cancer Lett. 1996; 102(1-2):31-7. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04151-1. View

5.
Inai T, Mancuso M, Hashizume H, Baffert F, Haskell A, Baluk P . Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. Am J Pathol. 2004; 165(1):35-52. PMC: 1618540. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63273-7. View