» Articles » PMID: 25001491

Optimizing Multiplex SNP-based Data Analysis for Genotyping of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isolates

Abstract

Background: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a powerful tool to identify genomic polymorphisms. We have previously developed a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and large sequence polymorphisms (LSP)-based MLPA assay using a read out on a liquid bead array to screen for 47 genetic markers in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. In our assay we obtain information regarding the Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage and drug resistance simultaneously. Previously we called the presence or absence of a genotypic marker based on a threshold signal level. Here we present a more elaborate data analysis method to standardize and streamline the interpretation of data generated by MLPA. The new data analysis method also identifies intermediate signals in addition to classification of signals as positive and negative. Intermediate calls can be informative with respect to identifying the simultaneous presence of sensitive and resistant alleles or infection with multiple different Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains.

Results: To validate our analysis method 100 DNA isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis extracted from cultured patient material collected at the National TB Reference Laboratory of the National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia were tested by MLPA. The data generated were interpreted blindly and then compared to results obtained by reference methods. MLPA profiles containing intermediate calls are flagged for expert review whereas the majority of profiles, not containing intermediate calls, were called automatically. No intermediate signals were identified in 74/100 isolates and in the remaining 26 isolates at least one genetic marker produced an intermediate signal.

Conclusion: Based on excellent agreement with the reference methods we conclude that the new data analysis method performed well. The streamlined data processing and standardized data interpretation allows the comparison of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MLPA results between different experiments. All together this will facilitate the implementation of the MLPA assay in different settings.

Citing Articles

Genetic profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed "modern" Beijing strains linked to MDR-TB from Southwestern Colombia.

Nieto Ramirez L, Ferro B, Diaz G, Anthony R, de Beer J, van Soolingen D PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0224908.

PMID: 32330146 PMC: 7182180. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224908.


Genomic characterization of MDR/XDR-TB in Kazakhstan by a combination of high-throughput methods predominantly shows the ongoing transmission of L2/Beijing 94-32 central Asian/Russian clusters.

Klotoe B, Kacimi S, Costa-Conceicao E, Gomes H, Barcellos R, Panaiotov S BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):553.

PMID: 31234780 PMC: 6592005. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4201-2.


Detection of tuberculosis drug resistance: a comparison by Mycobacterium tuberculosis MLPA assay versus Genotype®MTBDRplus.

Santos P, Costa E, Ramalho D, Rossetti M, Barcellos R, de Souza Nunes L Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017; 112(6):396-403.

PMID: 28591399 PMC: 5446228. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160376.


Methodological and Clinical Aspects of the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Other Mycobacteria.

Jagielski T, Minias A, van Ingen J, Rastogi N, Brzostek A, Zaczek A Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 29(2):239-90.

PMID: 26912567 PMC: 4786889. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00055-15.


Enzyme-Free Detection of Mutations in Cancer DNA Using Synthetic Oligonucleotide Probes and Fluorescence Microscopy.

Miotke L, Maity A, Ji H, Brewer J, Astakhova K PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0136720.

PMID: 26312489 PMC: 4552304. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136720.


References
1.
Pardini M, Niemann S, Varaine F, Iona E, Meacci F, Orru G . Characteristics of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Abkhazia (Georgia), a high-prevalence area in Eastern Europe. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009; 89(4):317-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.04.002. View

2.
Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S . Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(4):907-14. PMC: 229700. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.907-914.1997. View

3.
Ramaswamy S, Musser J . Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tuber Lung Dis. 2000; 79(1):3-29. DOI: 10.1054/tuld.1998.0002. View

4.
Theelen W, Reijans M, Simons G, Ramaekers F, Speel E, Hopman A . A new multiparameter assay to assess HPV 16/18, viral load and physical status together with gain of telomerase genes in HPV-related cancers. Int J Cancer. 2009; 126(4):959-75. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24844. View

5.
Deshpande A, Gans J, Graves S, Green L, Taylor L, Kim H . A rapid multiplex assay for nucleic acid-based diagnostics. J Microbiol Methods. 2009; 80(2):155-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.12.001. View