» Articles » PMID: 24982100

A Parent Questionnaire for Developmental Screening in Infants Born Late and Moderately Preterm

Overview
Journal Pediatrics
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2014 Jul 2
PMID 24982100
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) is a questionnaire for assessing cognitive and language development in very preterm infants. Given the increased risk of developmental delay in infants born late and moderately preterm (LMPT; 32-36 weeks), this study aimed to validate this questionnaire as a screening tool in this population.

Methods: Parents of 219 children born LMPT completed the PARCA-R questionnaire and the Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment when children were 24 months corrected age (range, 24 months-27 months). The children were subsequently assessed by using the cognitive and language scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III).

Results: An average Bayley-III, cognitive and language (CB-III) score and a total PARCA-R Parent Report Composite (PRC) score were computed. There was a large association between PRC and CB-III scores (r = 0.66, P < .001) indicating good concurrent validity. Using Youden index, the optimum PARCA-R cutoff for identifying children with moderate/severe developmental delay (CB-III scores < 80) was PRC scores < 73. This gave sensitivity 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.00) and specificity 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.82), indicating good diagnostic utility. Approximately two-thirds of the children who had a PRC score < 73 had false-positive screens. However, these children had significantly poorer cognitive and behavioral outcomes than children with true negative screens.

Conclusions: The PARCA-R has good concurrent validity with a gold standard developmental test and can be used to identify LMPT infants who may benefit from a clinical assessment. The PARCA-R has potential for clinical use as a first-line cognitive screening tool for this sizeable population of infants in whom follow-up may be beneficial.

Citing Articles

Do Children Cause the Cognitive Stimulation they Receive? Modelling the Direction of Causality.

Starr A, Oginni O, von Stumm S Behav Genet. 2024; 54(6):443-455.

PMID: 39251457 PMC: 11564400. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-024-10195-w.


Does age moderate the influence of early life language experiences? A Naturalistic home observation study.

dApice K, von Stumm S Early Child Res Q. 2024; 63:400-409.

PMID: 38213871 PMC: 10776961. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.01.009.


Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a study protocol for the 2-year follow-up of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial.

Rasmussen M, Hansen M, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J Trials. 2023; 24(1):653.

PMID: 37805539 PMC: 10560418. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07653-x.


Web-based follow-up tool (ePIPARI) of preterm infants-study protocol for feasibility and performance.

Saarinen T, Ylijoki M, Lehtonen L, Munck P, Stolt S, Lapinleimu H BMC Pediatr. 2023; 23(1):413.

PMID: 37612695 PMC: 10463747. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04226-4.


An Observational Cohort Study and Nested Randomized Controlled Trial on Nutrition and Growth Outcomes in Moderate and Late Preterm Infants (FLAMINGO).

Kakaroukas A, Abrahamse-Berkeveld M, Berrington J, McNally R, Stewart C, Embleton N Front Nutr. 2021; 8:561419.

PMID: 33763438 PMC: 7982654. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.561419.