» Articles » PMID: 24957183

Additional MR Contrast Dosage for Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Detecting Brain Metastases: a Systematic Observer Study at 3 T

Overview
Journal Jpn J Radiol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Jun 25
PMID 24957183
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a double-dose administration of gadolinium for brain metastases at 3 T in a systematic observer test.

Materials And Methods: Postcontrast MR images of 39 patients (total 104 metastases) were obtained by 3D T1-weighted sequences with both standard and cumulative double dose contrast administration. An observer test involving 9 radiologists (5 board-certified radiologists and 4 residents) was performed, and their diagnostic performance with the two doses was compared by means of sensitivity, false-positives, reading time, and a figure-of-merit.

Results: Compared to the standard dose, the double dose showed higher sensitivity (P < 0.0001), higher false-positive/case (P < 0.05), longer reading time (P < 0.05), and higher figure-of-merit (P < 0.0001). Particularly in small lesions (< 5 mm), sensitivity with the double dose (61.5%, P < 0.0001) was approximately twice as high as that with the standard dose (29.5%). Artifacts and blood vessels were the most common imaging findings resulting in false-positives.

Conclusions: The double dose improved detection for metastases smaller than 5 mm at 3 T and thus resulted in better diagnostic performance of radiologists. However, a higher dose might result in prolonged reading time and increased false-positives, presumably due to increased vessel signals and frequency of flow-related artifacts.

Citing Articles

Where Does Auto-Segmentation for Brain Metastases Radiosurgery Stand Today?.

Kim M, Wang J, Lu W, Jiang H, Stojadinovic S, Wardak Z Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790322 PMC: 11117895. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050454.


Incidence and imaging characteristics of difficult to detect retrospectively identified brain metastases in patients receiving repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Fairchild A, Salama J, Godfrey D, Wiggins W, Ackerson B, Oyekunle T J Neurooncol. 2024; 167(1):219-227.

PMID: 38340295 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04594-6.


Time optimization of gadobutrol-enhanced brain MRI for metastases and primary tumors using a dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.

Seo J, Lim C, Lee K, Koh Y, Moon W BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):180.

PMID: 36253718 PMC: 9575215. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00909-z.


Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management.

Mitchell D, Kwon H, Kubica P, Huff W, ORegan R, Dey M Neurochirurgie. 2021; 68(1):69-85.

PMID: 33864773 PMC: 8514593. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.001.


Brain Metastases From Lung Adenocarcinoma May Preferentially Involve the Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Territory and Cerebellum.

Kwon H, Kim J, Park M, Kim J, Kim M, Suh S Front Oncol. 2020; 10:1664.

PMID: 32984041 PMC: 7484698. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01664.


References
1.
Chakraborty D . Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. Acad Radiol. 2006; 13(10):1187-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.016. View

2.
Linskey M, Andrews D, Asher A, Burri S, Kondziolka D, Robinson P . The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2009; 96(1):45-68. PMC: 2808519. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-0073-4. View

3.
Nagao E, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, Obara M, Yamashita K, Kamano H . 3D turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation for detection of brain metastases on 3T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(4):664-70. PMC: 7965899. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2343. View

4.
van Dijk P, Sijens P, Schmitz P, Oudkerk M . Gd-enhanced MR imaging of brain metastases: contrast as a function of dose and lesion size. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 15(5):535-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00015-5. View

5.
Cairncross J . Neurological emergencies in cancer patients. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1983; 132D:319-28. View