Pronold J, van Meegen A, Shimoura R, Vollenbroker H, Senden M, Hilgetag C
Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(10).
PMID: 39428578
PMC: 11491286.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae409.
Monzel M, Leelaarporn P, Lutz T, Schultz J, Brunheim S, Reuter M
Elife. 2024; 13.
PMID: 39325034
PMC: 11426968.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94916.
Zbaren G, Kapur M, Meissner S, Wenderoth N
Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 229(7):1605-1615.
PMID: 38914897
PMC: 11374914.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02815-2.
Dijkstra N
Vision (Basel). 2024; 8(2.
PMID: 38804350
PMC: 11130976.
DOI: 10.3390/vision8020029.
Tononi G, Boly M, Cirelli C
Neuron. 2024; 112(10):1568-1594.
PMID: 38697113
PMC: 11105109.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.04.011.
Predicting the subjective intensity of imagined experiences from electrophysiological measures of oscillatory brain activity.
Arnold D, Saurels B, Anderson N, Andresen I, Schwarzkopf D
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):836.
PMID: 38191506
PMC: 10774351.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50760-7.
Visualizing risky situations induces a stronger neural response in brain areas associated with mental imagery and emotions than visualizing non-risky situations.
Zaleskiewicz T, Traczyk J, Sobkow A, Fulawka K, Megias-Robles A
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1207364.
PMID: 37795209
PMC: 10546025.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1207364.
Modelling perception as a hierarchical competition differentiates imagined, veridical, and hallucinated percepts.
Sulfaro A, Robinson A, Carlson T
Neurosci Conscious. 2023; 2023(1):niad018.
PMID: 37621984
PMC: 10445666.
DOI: 10.1093/nc/niad018.
Event-Related Desynchronization Induced by Tactile Imagery: an EEG Study.
Yakovlev L, Syrov N, Miroshnikov A, Lebedev M, Kaplan A
eNeuro. 2023; 10(6).
PMID: 37263791
PMC: 10275400.
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0455-22.2023.
Physical inference of falling objects involves simulation of occluded trajectories in early visual areas.
Zbaren G, Meissner S, Kapur M, Wenderoth N
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 44(10):4183-4196.
PMID: 37195021
PMC: 10258535.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26338.
Imagining one experience to be another.
Nanay B
Synthese. 2022; 199(5-6):13977-13991.
PMID: 35058666
PMC: 8727398.
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-021-03406-y.
No Evidence for Neural Overlap between Unconsciously Processed and Imagined Stimuli.
Dijkstra N, van Gaal S, Geerligs L, Bosch S, van Gerven M
eNeuro. 2021; 8(5).
PMID: 34593516
PMC: 8577044.
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0228-21.2021.
Unconscious mental imagery.
Nanay B
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 376(1817):20190689.
PMID: 33308067
PMC: 7741084.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0689.
Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?.
Koenig-Robert R, Pearson J
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 376(1817):20190703.
PMID: 33308061
PMC: 7741076.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0703.
Generative Feedback Explains Distinct Brain Activity Codes for Seen and Mental Images.
Breedlove J, St-Yves G, Olman C, Naselaris T
Curr Biol. 2020; 30(12):2211-2224.e6.
PMID: 32359428
PMC: 10230322.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.014.
Feature-specific neural reactivation during episodic memory.
Bone M, Ahmad F, Buchsbaum B
Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):1945.
PMID: 32327642
PMC: 7181630.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15763-2.
The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery.
Pearson J
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019; 20(10):624-634.
PMID: 31384033
DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9.
Spontaneous Visual Imagery During Meditation for Creating Visual Art: An EEG and Brain Stimulation Case Study.
Di Bernardi Luft C, Zioga I, Banissy M, Bhattacharya J
Front Psychol. 2019; 10:210.
PMID: 30853922
PMC: 6395393.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00210.
The dynamic contribution of the high-level visual cortex to imagery and perception.
Boccia M, Sulpizio V, Teghil A, Palermo L, Piccardi L, Galati G
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 40(8):2449-2463.
PMID: 30702203
PMC: 6865452.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24535.
Assessing recurrent interactions in cortical networks: Modeling EEG response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Chang J, Fecchio M, Pigorini A, Massimini M, Tononi G, Van Veen B
J Neurosci Methods. 2018; 312:93-104.
PMID: 30439389
PMC: 6901095.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.11.006.