Predicting the Subjective Intensity of Imagined Experiences from Electrophysiological Measures of Oscillatory Brain Activity

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Jan 8

PMID 38191506

Authors

Derek H Arnold

Blake W Saurels

Natasha Anderson

Isabella Andresen

Dietrich S Schwarzkopf

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Most people can conjure images and sounds that they experience in their minds. There are, however, marked individual differences. Some people report that they cannot generate imagined sensory experiences at all (aphantasics) and others report that they have unusually intense imagined experiences (hyper-phantasics). These individual differences have been linked to activity in sensory brain regions, driven by feedback. We would therefore expect imagined experiences to be associated with specific frequencies of oscillatory brain activity, as these can be a hallmark of neural interactions within and across regions of the brain. Replicating a number of other studies, relative to a Resting-State we find that the act of engaging in auditory or in visual imagery is linked to reductions in the power of oscillatory brain activity across a broad range of frequencies, with prominent peaks in the alpha band (8-12 Hz). This oscillatory activity, however, did not predict individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences. For audio imagery, these were rather predicted by reductions within the theta (6-9 Hz) and gamma (33-38 Hz) bands, and by increases in beta (15-17 Hz) band activity. For visual imagery these were predicted by reductions in lower (14-16 Hz) and upper (29-32 Hz) beta band activity, and by an increase in mid-beta band (24-26 Hz) activity. Our data suggest that there is sufficient ground truth in the subjective reports people use to describe the intensity of their imagined sensory experiences to allow these to be linked to the power of distinct rhythms of brain activity. In future, we hope to combine this approach with better measures of the subjective intensity of imagined sensory experiences to provide a clearer picture of individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences, and of why these eventuate.

References

Blomkvist A, Marks D . Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?. Cortex. 2023; 169:220-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004. View

Pounder Z, Jacob J, Evans S, Loveday C, Eardley A, Silvanto J . Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery. Cortex. 2022; 148:180-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. View

Arnold D, Andresen I, Anderson N, Saurels B . Commonalities between the Berger Rhythm and spectra differences driven by cross-modal attention and imagination. Conscious Cogn. 2022; 107:103436. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103436. View

Bode S, Schubert E, Hogendoorn H, Feuerriegel D . Decoding continuous variables from event-related potential (ERP) data with linear support vector regression using the Decision Decoding Toolbox (DDTBOX). Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:989589. PMC: 9669708. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.989589. View

Dijkstra N, Zeidman P, Ondobaka S, van Gerven M, Friston K . Distinct Top-down and Bottom-up Brain Connectivity During Visual Perception and Imagery. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5677. PMC: 5516016. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05888-8. View

Marothi R, Keri S . Enhanced mental imagery and intact perceptual organization in schizotypal personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2017; 259:433-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.015. View

Cooper N, Croft R, Dominey S, Burgess A, Gruzelier J . Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003; 47(1):65-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00107-1. View

van Kerkoerle T, Self M, Dagnino B, Gariel-Mathis M, Poort J, van der Togt C . Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(40):14332-41. PMC: 4210002. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402773111. View

Okazaki M, Kaneko Y, Yumoto M, Arima K . Perceptual change in response to a bistable picture increases neuromagnetic beta-band activities. Neurosci Res. 2008; 61(3):319-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.03.010. View

10.

Hinwar R, Lambert A . Anauralia: The Silent Mind and Its Association With Aphantasia. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:744213. PMC: 8551557. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744213. View

11.

Dawes A, Keogh R, Andrillon T, Pearson J . A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):10022. PMC: 7308278. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7. View

12.

Xie S, Kaiser D, Cichy R . Visual Imagery and Perception Share Neural Representations in the Alpha Frequency Band. Curr Biol. 2020; 30(13):2621-2627.e5. PMC: 7342016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.074. View

13.

Cui X, Jeter C, Yang D, Montague P, Eagleman D . Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Res. 2007; 47(4):474-8. PMC: 1839967. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013. View

14.

Kay L, Keogh R, Andrillon T, Pearson J . The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength. Elife. 2022; 11. PMC: 9018072. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72484. View

15.

Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J . FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:156869. PMC: 3021840. DOI: 10.1155/2011/156869. View

16.

Kosslyn S, Ganis G, Thompson W . Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9):635-42. DOI: 10.1038/35090055. View

17.

Arnold D, Hohaia W, Yarrow K . Neural correlates of subjective timing precision and confidence. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3098. PMC: 7033100. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59322-7. View

18.

Harmony T, Fernandez T, Silva J, Bernal J, Diaz-Comas L, Reyes A . EEG delta activity: an indicator of attention to internal processing during performance of mental tasks. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996; 24(1-2):161-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00053-0. View

19.

Kaufman L, Schwartz B, Salustri C, Williamson S . Modulation of Spontaneous Brain Activity during Mental Imagery. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 2(2):124-32. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.2.124. View

20.

Miller E, Lundqvist M, Bastos A . Working Memory 2.0. Neuron. 2018; 100(2):463-475. PMC: 8112390. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023. View