Robot-assisted Vs. Sensory Integration Training in Treating Gait and Balance Dysfunctions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Extensive research on both healthy subjects and patients with central nervous damage has elucidated a crucial role of postural adjustment reactions and central sensory integration processes in generating and "shaping" locomotor function, respectively. Whether robotic-assisted gait devices might improve these functions in Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is not fully investigated in literature.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and sensory integration balance training (SIBT) in improving walking and balance performance in patients with MS.
Methods: Twenty-two patients with MS (EDSS: 1.5-6.5) were randomly assigned to two groups. The RAGT group (n = 12) underwent end-effector system training. The SIBT group (n = 10) underwent specific balance exercises. Each patient received twelve 50-min treatment sessions (2 days/week). A blinded rater evaluated patients before and after treatment as well as 1 month post treatment. Primary outcomes were walking speed and Berg Balance Scale. Secondary outcomes were the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Sensory Organization Balance Test, Stabilometric Assessment, Fatigue Severity Scale, cadence, step length, single and double support time, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54.
Results: Between groups comparisons showed no significant differences on primary and secondary outcome measures over time. Within group comparisons showed significant improvements in both groups on the Berg Balance Scale (P = 0.001). Changes approaching significance were found on gait speed (P = 0.07) only in the RAGT group. Significant changes in balance task-related domains during standing and walking conditions were found in the SIBT group.
Conclusion: Balance disorders in patients with MS may be ameliorated by RAGT and by SIBT.
Naser Moghadasi A, Rastkar M, Mohammadifar M, Mohammadi A, Ghajarzadeh M Caspian J Intern Med. 2024; 15(4):589-600.
PMID: 39359438 PMC: 11444109. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.15.4.589.
Interhemispheric inhibition and gait adaptation associations in people with multiple sclerosis.
Hagen A, Acosta J, Swanson C, Fling B Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(7):1761-1772.
PMID: 38822825 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06860-5.
Scientometric Research and Critical Analysis of Gait and Balance in Older Adults.
Mao Q, Zheng W, Shi M, Yang F Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).
PMID: 38794055 PMC: 11125350. DOI: 10.3390/s24103199.
Baroni A, Lamberti N, Gandolfi M, Rimondini M, Bertagnolo V, Grassilli S BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 10(2):e002039.
PMID: 38779575 PMC: 11110587. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002039.
Bonanno M, Maggio M, Ciatto L, De Luca R, Quartarone A, Alibrandi A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).
PMID: 38541771 PMC: 10970976. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061545.