» Articles » PMID: 38779575

Traditional Versus Progressive Robot-assisted Gait Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis and Severe Gait Disability: Study Protocol for the PROGR-EX Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 May 23
PMID 38779575
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gait disorders are the most frequent symptoms associated to multiple sclerosis (MS). Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in people with MS (PwMS) has been proposed as a possible effective treatment option for severe motor disability without significant superiority when compared to intensive overground gait training (OGT). Furthermore, RAGT at high intensity may enhance fatigue and spasticity. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a low-intensity RAGT at progressively increasing intensity compared to conventional RAGT and OGT in PwMS and moderate to severe walking impairment. 24 PwMS will be recruited and assigned to one of the three treatment groups: low-intensity RAGT at progressively increasing intensity, conventional RAGT and OGT. All participants will receive 3-weekly treatment sessions of 3 hours each for 4 weeks. In the first 2 hours of treatment, all participants will receive a rehabilitation programme based on stretching exercises, muscle strengthening and educational interventions. During the last hour, subjects will undergo specific gait training according to the assignment group. Outcomes will be assessed before and after treatment and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome is walking speed. Secondary outcomes include mobility and balance, psychological measures, muscle oxygen consumption, electrical and haemodynamic brain activity, urinary biomarkers, usability, and acceptability of robotic devices for motor rehabilitation. The results of this study will provide a safe, affordable and non-operator-dependent, intervention for PwMS. Results in terms of functional, psychological, neurophysiological and biological outcomes will confirm our hypothesis. The study's trial registration number: NCT06381440.

Citing Articles

STORMS: A Pilot Feasibility Study for Occupational TeleRehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis.

Vestito L, Ferraro F, Iaconi G, Genesio G, Bandini F, Mori L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409510 PMC: 11479386. DOI: 10.3390/s24196470.

References
1.
Gunzler D, De Nadai A, Miller D, Ontaneda D, Briggs F . Long-term trajectories of ambulatory impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2023; 29(10):1282-1295. PMC: 10528275. DOI: 10.1177/13524585231187521. View

2.
Monticone M, Giorgi I, Baiardi P, Barbieri M, Rocca B, Bonezzi C . Development of the Italian version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(12):1241-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfcbf6. View

3.
Grassilli S, Vezzali F, Cairo S, Brugnoli F, Volinia S, De Mattei M . Targeting the Vav1/miR‑29b axis as a potential approach for treating selected molecular subtypes of triple‑negative breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2021; 45(5). DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8034. View

4.
Beatty W, Goodkin D . Screening for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. An evaluation of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Neurol. 1990; 47(3):297-301. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530030069018. View

5.
Straudi S, Manfredini F, Lamberti N, Martinuzzi C, Maietti E, Basaglia N . Robot-assisted gait training is not superior to intensive overground walking in multiple sclerosis with severe disability (the RAGTIME study): A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2019; 26(6):716-724. DOI: 10.1177/1352458519833901. View