» Articles » PMID: 24888605

A Chemiluminescent Light System in Combination with Toluidine Blue to Assess Suspicious Oral Lesions-clinical Evaluation and Review of the Literature

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Jun 4
PMID 24888605
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was an evaluation of an acetic acid wash and chemiluminescent light system in combination with toluidine blue in order to detect visual identified, potentially malignant lesions.

Materials And Methods: Forty-four patients with 50 oral lesions of primary uncertain visible dignity were included. Next to a clinical examination, a screening with ViziLite® (VL) as well as toluidine blue (TB; together ViziLite® Plus (VLP)) was conducted. Histopathology served as gold standard and sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive as well as negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) was calculated descriptively. Additionally, a PubMed literature search using the key words "ViziLite" and "chemiluminescence oral cancer" was conducted.

Results: Histological diagnosis showed 40 lesions of reactive/inflammatory nature, moderate dysplasia (n = 3) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC n = 7). All OSCCs and one dysplasia were identified correct via clinical diagnosis (SE 90 %, SP 100 %, PPV 100 %, NPV 97.5 %). VL examination could show all malignancies with low specificity (SE 100 %, SP 30 %, PPV 26 %, NPV 100 %). TB and VLP were positive in all cases of cancer and in one case of inflammation (SE 80 %, SP 97.5 %, PPV 89 %, NPV 95 %). In the review, eight clinical trials with similar results were included.

Conclusions: The adjunct of TB to VL reduces the number of false positives without increasing the rate of false negatives.

Clinical Relevance: Clinical evidence to justify the additional cost of the system for diagnosis of suspicious lesions is weak. However, for the potential role of VLP in detection of lesions not otherwise identified in the visual exam in general dental practice further studies are required.

Citing Articles

Review of the Role of Nanotechnology in Overcoming the Challenges Faced in Oral Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Umapathy V, Natarajan P, Swamikannu B Molecules. 2023; 28(14).

PMID: 37513267 PMC: 10385509. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145395.


Oral cancer diagnostics: An overview.

Chaurasia A, Alam S, Singh N Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 12(3):324-332.

PMID: 35153426 PMC: 8820315. DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_130_20.


Diagnostic accuracy of conventional oral examination for detecting oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients with clinically evident oral lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Essat M, Cooper K, Bessey A, Clowes M, Chilcott J, Hunter K Head Neck. 2022; 44(4):998-1013.

PMID: 35092324 PMC: 9306506. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26992.


Hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence to detect oral malignancy - part 1 - automated tissue classification of oral muscle, fat and mucosa using a light-weight 6-layer deep neural network.

Thiem D, Romer P, Gielisch M, Al-Nawas B, Schluter M, Plass B Head Face Med. 2021; 17(1):38.

PMID: 34479595 PMC: 8414848. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-021-00292-0.


Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Governmental Containment Policies on the Detection and Therapy of Oral Malignant Lesions-A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study from Germany.

Heimes D, Muller L, Schellin A, Naujokat H, Graetz C, Schwendicke F Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34207863 PMC: 8227890. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122892.


References
1.
Mehrotra R, Singh M, Thomas S, Nair P, Pandya S, Nigam N . A cross-sectional study evaluating chemiluminescence and autofluorescence in the detection of clinically innocuous precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141(2):151-6. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0132. View

2.
Kujan O, Oliver R, Khattab A, Roberts S, Thakker N, Sloan P . Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation. Oral Oncol. 2006; 42(10):987-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.12.014. View

3.
MacAulay C, Poh C, Guillaud M, Michele Williams P, Laronde D, Zhang L . High throughput image cytometry for detection of suspicious lesions in the oral cavity. J Biomed Opt. 2012; 17(8):086004-1. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.086004. View

4.
Driemel O, Dahse R, Hakim S, Tsioutsias T, Pistner H, Reichert T . Laminin-5 immunocytochemistry: a new tool for identifying dysplastic cells in oral brush biopsies. Cytopathology. 2007; 18(6):348-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00401.x. View

5.
Zadik Y, Orbach H, Panzok A, Smith Y, Czerninski R . Evaluation of oral mucosal diseases: inter- and intra-observer analyses. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011; 41(1):68-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01070.x. View