» Articles » PMID: 33642212

Efficacy of Non-invasive Diagnostic Methods in the Diagnosis and Screening of Oral Cancer and Precancer

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 1
PMID 33642212
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Traditional meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of oral lesions have been conducted, but they were inherently limited to direct pairwise comparisons between a single method and a single alternative, while multiple diagnostic options and the ranking thereof were methodologically not possible.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic values of various methods in patients with oral potential malignant disease by performing a network meta-analysis.

Methods: Two authors independently searched the databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google scholar) up to June 2020 for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of various tools (autofluorescence, chemiluminescence, cytology, narrow band imaging, and toluidine blue) with visual examination or other tools. The outcomes of interest for this analysis were sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy. Both a standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted.

Results: Treatment networks consisting of six interventions were defined for the network meta-analysis. The results of traditional meta-analysis showed that, among six methods, narrow band imaging showed higher sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy compared to visual examination. The results of network meta-analysis showed that autofluorescence, chemiluminescence, and narrow band imaging had higher sensitivity compared with visual examination, and that chemiluminescence and narrow band imaging had higher negative predictive value compared with visual examination. However, autofluorescence and chemiluminescence had lower specificity compared with visual examination. There were no significant differences in positive predictive value and accuracy among the six interventions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that narrow banding imaging has superiority in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with the other five tested agents.

Citing Articles

The Diagnostic Potential of Non-Invasive Tools for Oral Cancer and Precancer: A Systematic Review.

Pierfelice T, DAmico E, Cinquini C, Iezzi G, DArcangelo C, DErcole S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335712 PMC: 11431589. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182033.


Adjunctive aids for the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Lau J, O G, Warnakulasuriya S, Balasubramaniam R, Frydrych A, Kujan O Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024; 60:53-72.

PMID: 38283580 PMC: 10821377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.12.004.


Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Barsouk A, Aluru J, Rawla P, Saginala K, Barsouk A Med Sci (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 37367741 PMC: 10304137. DOI: 10.3390/medsci11020042.


Accuracy of narrow band imaging for detecting the malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Wu Y, Pan D, Zhang Z, Jiang L, Feng X Front Surg. 2023; 9:1068256.

PMID: 36684262 PMC: 9857777. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1068256.


Implementation of Routine Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging in the Evaluation of Oral and Upper Airways Lesions in Oral Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Nitro L, Pipolo C, Castellarin P, Sardella A, Bulfamante A, De Marco B J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36294767 PMC: 9605591. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101628.

References
1.
Vashisht N, Ravikiran A, Samatha Y, Rao P, Naik R, Vashisht D . Chemiluminescence and Toluidine Blue as Diagnostic Tools for Detecting Early Stages of Oral Cancer: An invivo Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(4):ZC35-8. PMC: 4064898. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7746.4259. View

2.
Jayaprakash V, Sullivan M, Merzianu M, Rigual N, Loree T, Popat S . Autofluorescence-guided surveillance for oral cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009; 2(11):966-74. PMC: 3653312. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0062. View

3.
Rouse B, Chaimani A, Li T . Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med. 2016; 12(1):103-111. PMC: 5247317. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7. View

4.
Allegra E, Lombardo N, Puzzo L, Garozzo A . The usefulness of toluidine staining as a diagnostic tool for precancerous and cancerous oropharyngeal and oral cavity lesions. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010; 29(4):187-90. PMC: 2816365. View

5.
Chaudhari A, Hegde-Shetiya S, Shirahatti R, Agrawal D . Comparison of different screening methods in estimating the prevalence of precancer and cancer amongst male inmates of a jail in maharashtra, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013; 14(2):859-64. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.859. View