» Articles » PMID: 24886489

Evaluation of Partnerships in a Transnational Family Violence Prevention Network Using an Integrated Knowledge Translation and Exchange Model: a Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24886489
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Family violence is a significant and complex public health problem that demands collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers for systemic, sustainable solutions. An integrated knowledge translation network was developed to support joint research production and application in the area. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the international Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network built effective partnerships among its members, with a focus on the knowledge user partner perspective.

Methods: This mixed-methods study employed a combination of questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to understand partnerships two years after PreVAiL's inception. The questionnaire examined communication, collaborative research, dissemination of research, research findings, negotiation, partnership enhancement, information needs, rapport, and commitment. The interviews elicited feedback about partners' experiences with being part of the network.

Results: Five main findings were highlighted: i) knowledge user partner involvement varied across activities, ranging from 11% to 79% participation rates; ii) partners and researchers generally converged on their assessment of communication indicators; iii) partners valued the network at both an individual level and to fulfill their organizations' mandates; iv) being part of PreVAiL allowed partners to readily contact researchers, and partners felt comfortable acting as an intermediary between PreVAiL and the rest of their own organization; v) application of research was just emerging; partners needed more actionable insights to determine ways to move forward given the research at that point in time.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the importance of developing and nurturing strong partnerships for integrated knowledge translation. Our findings are applicable to other network-oriented partnerships where a diversity of stakeholders work to address complex, multi-faceted public health problems.

Citing Articles

Co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching: a mixed methods case study within a review.

Jull J, Smith M, Carley M, Stacey D, Graham I Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):149.

PMID: 38831444 PMC: 11149211. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02563-8.


Taking Stock of Knowledge Transfer Studies: Finding Ways Forward.

Lundmark C, Nilsson J, Krook-Riekkola A Environ Manage. 2023; 72(6):1146-1162.

PMID: 37688647 PMC: 10570201. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01877-y.


Bridging the gap: Identifying diverse stakeholder needs and barriers to accessing evidence and resources for children's pain.

MacKenzie N, Chambers C, Parker J, Aubrey E, Jordan I, Richards D Can J Pain. 2022; 6(1):48-64.

PMID: 35603313 PMC: 9116405. DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2045192.


Using an integrated knowledge translation approach to inform a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on peer support for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A qualitative descriptive study.

Lau S, Luong D, Sweet S, Bayley M, Levy B, Kastner M PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256650.

PMID: 34428259 PMC: 8384186. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256650.


Mixed method evaluation of the CEBHA+ integrated knowledge translation approach: a protocol.

Pfadenhauer L, Grath T, Delobelle P, Jessani N, Meerpohl J, Rohwer A Health Res Policy Syst. 2021; 19(1):7.

PMID: 33461592 PMC: 7813167. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00675-w.


References
1.
Bowen S, Martens P . Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10(4):203-11. DOI: 10.1258/135581905774414213. View

2.
Wathen C, Macgregor J, Sibbald S, MacMillan H . Exploring the uptake and framing of research evidence on universal screening for intimate partner violence against women: a knowledge translation case study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013; 11:13. PMC: 3637368. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-13. View

3.
Lapaige V . "Integrated knowledge translation" for globally oriented public health practitioners and scientists: Framing together a sustainable transfrontier knowledge translation vision. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011; 3:33-47. PMC: 3004597. DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s5338. View

4.
Smith K, Bambra C, Joyce K, Perkins N, Hunter D, Blenkinsopp E . Partners in health? A systematic review of the impact of organizational partnerships on public health outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009; 31(2):210-21. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp002. View

5.
Lomas J . Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis. Healthc Policy. 2009; 1(1):55-71. PMC: 2585236. View