» Articles » PMID: 33461592

Mixed Method Evaluation of the CEBHA+ Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach: a Protocol

Abstract

Background: The Collaboration for Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa (CEBHA+) is a research consortium concerned with the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of non-communicable diseases. CEBHA+ seeks to engage policymakers and practitioners throughout the research process in order to build lasting relationships, enhance evidence uptake, and create long-term capacity among partner institutions in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, South Africa and Uganda in collaboration with two German universities. This integrated knowledge translation (IKT) approach includes the formal development, implementation and evaluation of country specific IKT strategies.

Methods: We have conceptualised the CEBHA+ IKT approach as a complex intervention in a complex system. We will employ a comparative case study (CCS) design and mixed methods to facilitate an in-depth evaluation. We will use quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, quarterly updates, and a policy document analysis to capture the process and outcomes of IKT across the African CEBHA+ partner sites. We will conduct an early stage (early 2020) and a late-stage evaluation (early 2022), triangulate the data collected with various methods at each site and subsequently compare our findings across the five sites.

Discussion: Evaluating a complex intervention such as the CEBHA+ IKT approach is complicated, even more so when undertaken across five diverse countries. Despite conceptual, methodological and practical challenges, our comparative case study addresses important evidence gaps: While involving decision-makers in the research process is gaining traction worldwide, we still know very little regarding (i) whether this approach really makes a difference to evidence uptake, (ii) the mechanisms that make IKT successful, and (iii) relevant differences across socio-cultural contexts. The evaluation described here is intended to provide relevant insights on all of these aspects, notably in countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and is expected to contribute to the science of IKT overall.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study.

Sell K, Rehfuess E, Osuret J, Bayiga-Zziwa E, Geremew B, Pfadenhauer L Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):162.

PMID: 39658798 PMC: 11629502. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x.


Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.

Schmidt B, Mabetha D, Chibuzor M, Kunje G, Arikpo D, Aquaisua E BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1418.

PMID: 38802829 PMC: 11131200. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8.


Multi-country collaborative citizen science projects to co-design cardiovascular disease prevention strategies and advocacy: findings from Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, and South Africa.

Okop K, Kedir K, Kasenda S, Niyibizi J, Chipeta E, Getachew H BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2484.

PMID: 38087240 PMC: 10714547. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17393-x.


Integrated Knowledge Translation for Non-Communicable Diseases: Stories from Sub-Saharan Africa.

Jessani N, Delobelle P, Balugaba B, Mpando T, Ayele F, Ntawuyirushintege S Ann Glob Health. 2023; 89(1):87.

PMID: 38077262 PMC: 10705024. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4228.


Developing, implementing, and monitoring tailored strategies for integrated knowledge translation in five sub-Saharan African countries.

Sell K, Jessani N, Mesfin F, Rehfuess E, Rohwer A, Delobelle P Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21(1):91.

PMID: 37667309 PMC: 10478471. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01038-x.


References
1.
Bowen S, Martens P . Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10(4):203-11. DOI: 10.1258/135581905774414213. View

2.
Edwards A, Zweigenthal V, Olivier J . Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1):16. PMC: 6367796. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0. View

3.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T . Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43(3-4):267-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9. View

4.
Van Olphen J, Ottoson J, Green L, Barlow J, Koblick K, Hiatt R . Evaluation of a partnership approach to translating research on breast cancer and the environment. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010; 3(3):199. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.0.0078. View

5.
Soper B, Yaqub O, Hinrichs S, Marjanovich S, Drabble S, Hanney S . CLAHRCs in practice: combined knowledge transfer and exchange strategies, cultural change, and experimentation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013; 18(3 Suppl):53-64. DOI: 10.1177/1355819613499903. View