» Articles » PMID: 24852497

Aging Increases Distraction by Auditory Oddballs in Visual, but Not Auditory Tasks

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2014 May 24
PMID 24852497
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aging is typically considered to bring a reduction of the ability to resist distraction by task-irrelevant stimuli. Yet recent work suggests that this conclusion must be qualified and that the effect of aging is mitigated by whether irrelevant and target stimuli emanate from the same modalities or from distinct ones. Some studies suggest that aging is especially sensitive to distraction within-modality while others suggest it is greater across modalities. Here we report the first study to measure the effect of aging on deviance distraction in cross-modal (auditory-visual) and uni-modal (auditory-auditory) oddball tasks. Young and older adults were asked to judge the parity of target digits (auditory or visual in distinct blocks of trials), each preceded by a task-irrelevant sound (the same tone on most trials-the standard sound-or, on rare and unpredictable trials, a burst of white noise-the deviant sound). Deviant sounds yielded distraction (longer response times relative to standard sounds) in both tasks and age groups. However, an age-related increase in distraction was observed in the cross-modal task and not in the uni-modal task. We argue that aging might affect processes involved in the switching of attention across modalities and speculate that this may due to the slowing of this type of attentional shift or a reduction in cognitive control required to re-orient attention toward the target's modality.

Citing Articles

A Scoping Review of Audiovisual Integration Methodology: Screening for Auditory and Visual Impairment in Younger and Older Adults.

Basharat A, Thayanithy A, Barnett-Cowan M Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 13:772112.

PMID: 35153716 PMC: 8829696. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.772112.


Aging Increases Cross-Modal Distraction by Unexpected Sounds: Controlling for Response Speed.

Leiva A, Andres P, Parmentier F Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13:733388.

PMID: 34603010 PMC: 8480473. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.733388.


Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?.

Mahajan Y, Kim J, Davis C BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):515.

PMID: 33256631 PMC: 7708091. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01909-w.


Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Vasilev M, Parmentier F, Angele B, Kirkby J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018; 72(7):1863-1875.

PMID: 30518304 PMC: 6613176. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818820816.


Multisensory Integration Strategy for Modality-Specific Loss of Inhibition Control in Older Adults.

Lee A, Ryu H, Kim J, Jeong E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4).

PMID: 29641462 PMC: 5923760. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040718.


References
1.
Berti S, Schroger E . Distraction effects in vision: behavioral and event-related potential indices. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(4):665-9. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200403220-00018. View

2.
Berti S . Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(4):608-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00660.x. View

3.
Enmarker I . The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory. Scand J Psychol. 2004; 45(5):393-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00421.x. View

4.
Wetzel N, Widmann A, Schroger E . Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011; 38(3):664-74. DOI: 10.1037/a0025856. View

5.
Getzmann S, Gajewski P, Falkenstein M . Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiol Aging. 2013; 34(8):1952-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.014. View