Whole-genome Sequencing for High-resolution Investigation of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Epidemiology and Genome Plasticity
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections pose a major challenge in health care, yet the limited heterogeneity within this group hinders molecular investigations of related outbreaks. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the gold standard approach but is impractical for many clinical laboratories and is often replaced with PCR-based methods. Regardless, both approaches can prove problematic for identifying subclonal outbreaks. Here, we explore the use of whole-genome sequencing for clinical laboratory investigations of MRSA molecular epidemiology. We examine the relationships of 44 MRSA isolates collected over a period of 3 years by using whole-genome sequencing and two PCR-based methods, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) and spa typing. We find that MLVA offers higher resolution than spa typing, as it resolved 17 versus 12 discrete isolate groups, respectively. In contrast, whole-genome sequencing reproducibly cataloged genomic variants (131,424 different single nucleotide polymorphisms and indels across the strain collection) that uniquely identified each MRSA clone, recapitulating those groups but enabling higher-resolution phylogenetic inferences of the epidemiological relationships. Importantly, whole-genome sequencing detected a significant number of variants, thereby distinguishing between groups that were considered identical by both spa typing (minimum, 1,124 polymorphisms) and MLVA (minimum, 193 polymorphisms); this suggests that these more conventional approaches can lead to false-positive identification of outbreaks due to inappropriate grouping of genetically distinct strains. An analysis of the distribution of variants across the MRSA genome reveals 47 mutational hot spots (comprising ∼ 2.5% of the genome) that account for 23.5% of the observed polymorphisms, and the use of this selected data set successfully recapitulates most epidemiological relationships in this pathogen group.
McGalliard R, Muhamadali H, AlMasoud N, Haldenby S, Romero-Soriano V, Allman E Future Microbiol. 2024; 19(9):795-810.
PMID: 38652264 PMC: 11290759. DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2024-0043.
Worley J, Crothers J, Wolfgang W, Gubbala Venkata S, Hoffmann M, Jayeola V J Clin Microbiol. 2023; 61(5):e0001423.
PMID: 37022157 PMC: 10204624. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00014-23.
Rassoulian Barrett S, Hoffman N, Rosenthal C, Bryan A, Marshall D, Lieberman J J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58(12).
PMID: 33028602 PMC: 7685877. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01605-20.
Contaminant DNA in bacterial sequencing experiments is a major source of false genetic variability.
Goig G, Blanco S, Garcia-Basteiro A, Comas I BMC Biol. 2020; 18(1):24.
PMID: 32122347 PMC: 7053099. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-0748-z.
Poormohammadi S, Farahani A, Mohajeri P Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019; 26(1):1-7.
PMID: 30622401 PMC: 6319195. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.001.