» Articles » PMID: 24832142

Using Simulation to Compare 4 Categories of Intervention for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risks

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 May 17
PMID 24832142
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Prevention Impacts Simulation Model (PRISM) projects the multiyear impacts of 22 different interventions aimed at reducing risk of cardiovascular disease. We grouped these into 4 categories: clinical, behavioral support, health promotion and access, and taxes and regulation. We simulated impacts for the United States overall and also for a less-advantaged county with a higher death rate. Of the 4 categories of intervention, taxes and regulation reduce costs the most in the short term (through 2020) and long term (through 2040) and reduce deaths the most in the long term; they are second to clinical interventions in reducing deaths in the short term. All 4 categories combined were required to bring costs and deaths in the less-advantaged county down to the national level.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of public health and economic impacts of dietary salt reduction initiatives on social security expenditures for cardiovascular disease control in Japan.

Ikeda N, Yamaguchi M, Kashino I, Sugiyama T, Miura K, Nishi N Hypertens Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39962165 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-025-02108-z.


Development and validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM).

Burke J, Copeland L, Sussman J, Hayward R, Gross A, Briceno E PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0300005.

PMID: 38753617 PMC: 11098406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300005.


Increasing use of systems science in cardiovascular disease prevention to understand how to address geographic health disparities in communities with a disproportionate burden of risk.

Bauer K, Haapanen K, Demeke N, Fort M, Henderson K Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1216436.

PMID: 37522076 PMC: 10374219. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1216436.


Using system dynamics modelling to assess the economic efficiency of innovations in the public sector - a systematic review.

Jadeja N, Zhu N, Lebcir R, Sassi F, Holmes A, Ahmad R PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263299.

PMID: 35143541 PMC: 8830692. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263299.


Applications of System Dynamics Models in Chronic Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review.

Wang Y, Hu B, Zhao Y, Kuang G, Zhao Y, Liu Q Prev Chronic Dis. 2021; 18:E103.

PMID: 34941481 PMC: 8718124. DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.210175.


References
1.
Frieden T . A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(4):590-5. PMC: 2836340. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652. View

2.
Adler N, Stewart J . Preface to the biology of disadvantage: socioeconomic status and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1186:1-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05385.x. View

3.
Satcher D, Fryer Jr G, McCann J, Troutman A, Woolf S, Rust G . What if we were equal? A comparison of the black-white mortality gap in 1960 and 2000. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24(2):459-64. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.459. View

4.
Homer J, Hirsch G . System dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(3):452-8. PMC: 1470525. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062059. View

5.
Hirsch G, Edelstein B, Frosh M, Anselmo T . A simulation model for designing effective interventions in early childhood caries. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9:E66. PMC: 3366771. DOI: 10.5888/pcd9.110219. View