» Articles » PMID: 24830675

Evidence for Increased Levels of Positive and Negative Selection on the X Chromosome Versus Autosomes in Humans

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 May 17
PMID 24830675
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Partially recessive variants under positive selection are expected to go to fixation more quickly on the X chromosome as a result of hemizygosity, an effect known as faster-X. Conversely, purifying selection is expected to reduce substitution rates more effectively on the X chromosome. Previous work in humans contrasted divergence on the autosomes and X chromosome, with results tending to support the faster-X effect. However, no study has yet incorporated both divergence and polymorphism to quantify the effects of both purifying and positive selection, which are opposing forces with respect to divergence. In this study, we develop a framework that integrates previously developed theory addressing differential rates of X and autosomal evolution with methods that jointly estimate the level of purifying and positive selection via modeling of the distribution of fitness effects (DFE). We then utilize this framework to estimate the proportion of nonsynonymous substitutions fixed by positive selection (α) using exome sequence data from a West African population. We find that varying the female to male breeding ratio (β) has minimal impact on the DFE for the X chromosome, especially when compared with the effect of varying the dominance coefficient of deleterious alleles (h). Estimates of α range from 46% to 51% and from 4% to 24% for the X chromosome and autosomes, respectively. While dependent on h, the magnitude of the difference between α values estimated for these two systems is highly statistically significant over a range of biologically realistic parameter values, suggesting faster-X has been operating in humans.

Citing Articles

Reduced Efficacy of Selection on a Young Z Chromosome Region of Schistosoma japonicum.

Mrnjavac A, Vicoso B Genome Biol Evol. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39913672 PMC: 11833683. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaf021.


Comparative Patterns of Variation on the X Chromosome and Autosomes: The Role of the Breeding Sex Ratio.

Spurley W, Payseur B bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896627 PMC: 11785124. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.17.633266.


Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.

McDonough Y, Ruzicka F, Connallon T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(44):e2406335121.

PMID: 39436652 PMC: 11536091. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2406335121.


Population variability in X-chromosome inactivation across 10 mammalian species.

Werner J, Hover J, Gillis J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8991.

PMID: 39420003 PMC: 11487087. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53449-1.


Constraining models of dominance for nonsynonymous mutations in the human genome.

Kyriazis C, Lohmueller K PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(9):e1011198.

PMID: 39302992 PMC: 11446423. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011198.


References
1.
Hammer M, Woerner A, Mendez F, Watkins J, Cox M, Wall J . The ratio of human X chromosome to autosome diversity is positively correlated with genetic distance from genes. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(10):830-1. DOI: 10.1038/ng.651. View

2.
Eyre-Walker A . Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Genetics. 2003; 162(4):2017-24. PMC: 1462352. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2017. View

3.
McDonald J, Kreitman M . Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991; 351(6328):652-4. DOI: 10.1038/351652a0. View

4.
Rice W . SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM. Evolution. 2017; 38(4):735-742. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00346.x. View

5.
Kimura M . On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962; 47:713-9. PMC: 1210364. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. View