Population Variability in X-chromosome Inactivation Across 10 Mammalian Species

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Oct 17

PMID 39420003

Authors

Jonathan M Werner

John Hover

Jesse Gillis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

One of the two X-chromosomes in female mammals is epigenetically silenced in embryonic stem cells by X-chromosome inactivation. This creates a mosaic of cells expressing either the maternal or the paternal X allele. The X-chromosome inactivation ratio, the proportion of inactivated parental alleles, varies widely among individuals, representing the largest instance of epigenetic variability within mammalian populations. While various contributing factors to X-chromosome inactivation variability are recognized, namely stochastic and/or genetic effects, their relative contributions are poorly understood. This is due in part to limited cross-species analysis, making it difficult to distinguish between generalizable or species-specific mechanisms for X-chromosome inactivation ratio variability. To address this gap, we measure X-chromosome inactivation ratios in ten mammalian species (9531 individual samples), ranging from rodents to primates, and compare the strength of stochastic models or genetic factors for explaining X-chromosome inactivation variability. Our results demonstrate the embryonic stochasticity of X-chromosome inactivation is a general explanatory model for population X-chromosome inactivation variability in mammals, while genetic factors play a minor role.

Citing Articles

46,XY disorders of sex development and muscular dystrophy caused by Xp21 duplication: a case report and literature review.

Zheng X, Zhou Q, Gu W Transl Pediatr. 2024; 13(11):2088-2096.

PMID: 39649651 PMC: 11621888. DOI: 10.21037/tp-24-327.

References

Lyon M . Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature. 1961; 190:372-3. DOI: 10.1038/190372a0. View

Migeon B . An overview of X inactivation based on species differences. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 56:111-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.024. View

Okamoto I, Patrat C, Thepot D, Peynot N, Fauque P, Daniel N . Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development. Nature. 2011; 472(7343):370-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature09872. View

Lyon M . X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1972; 47(1):1-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1972.tb00969.x. View

van den Berg I, Laven J, Stevens M, Jonkers I, Galjaard R, Gribnau J . X chromosome inactivation is initiated in human preimplantation embryos. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84(6):771-9. PMC: 2694969. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.003. View

Evans H, Ford C, Lyon M, Gray J . DNA replication and genetic expression in female mice with morphologically distinguishable X chromosomes. Nature. 1965; 206(987):900-3. DOI: 10.1038/206900a0. View

Wu H, Luo J, Yu H, Rattner A, Mo A, Wang Y . Cellular resolution maps of X chromosome inactivation: implications for neural development, function, and disease. Neuron. 2014; 81(1):103-19. PMC: 3950970. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.051. View

Mutzel V, Okamoto I, Dunkel I, Saitou M, Giorgetti L, Heard E . A symmetric toggle switch explains the onset of random X inactivation in different mammals. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019; 26(5):350-360. PMC: 6558282. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-019-0214-1. View

Fang H, Deng X, Disteche C . X-factors in human disease: impact of gene content and dosage regulation. Hum Mol Genet. 2021; 30(R2):R285-R295. PMC: 8490017. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddab221. View

10.

Amos-Landgraf J, Cottle A, Plenge R, Friez M, Schwartz C, Longshore J . X chromosome-inactivation patterns of 1,005 phenotypically unaffected females. Am J Hum Genet. 2006; 79(3):493-9. PMC: 1559535. DOI: 10.1086/507565. View

11.

Shvetsova E, Sofronova A, Monajemi R, Gagalova K, Draisma H, White S . Skewed X-inactivation is common in the general female population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018; 27(3):455-465. PMC: 6460563. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0291-3. View

12.

MIGEON B . Non-random X chromosome inactivation in mammalian cells. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998; 80(1-4):142-8. DOI: 10.1159/000014971. View

13.

Plenge R, Hendrich B, Schwartz C, Arena J, Naumova A, Sapienza C . A promoter mutation in the XIST gene in two unrelated families with skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Nat Genet. 1997; 17(3):353-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng1197-353. View

14.

Belmont J . Genetic control of X inactivation and processes leading to X-inactivation skewing. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 58(6):1101-8. PMC: 1915050. View

15.

Brown C, Robinson W . The causes and consequences of random and non-random X chromosome inactivation in humans. Clin Genet. 2001; 58(5):353-63. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580504.x. View

16.

Cattanach B, Isaacson J . Genetic control over the inactivation of autosomal genes attached to the X-chromosome. Z Vererbungsl. 1965; 96(4):313-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00895048. View

17.

Sun K, Oreper D, Schoenrock S, McMullan R, Giusti-Rodriguez P, Zhabotynsky V . Bayesian modeling of skewed X inactivation in genetically diverse mice identifies a novel Xce allele associated with copy number changes. Genetics. 2021; 218(1). PMC: 8128399. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab034. View

18.

Peeters S, Yang C, Brown C . Have humans lost control: The elusive X-controlling element. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 56:71-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.044. View

19.

Gandini E, Gartler S, Angioni G, Argiolas N, DellAcqua G . Developmental implications of multiple tissue studies in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient heterozygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968; 61(3):945-8. PMC: 305419. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.61.3.945. View

20.

Gandini E, Gartler S . Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase mosaicism for studying the development of blood cell precursors. Nature. 1969; 224(5219):599-600. DOI: 10.1038/224599a0. View