» Articles » PMID: 24829756

Immunologic Responses to Xenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine Administered by Electroporation in Patients with Malignant Melanoma

Overview
Date 2014 May 16
PMID 24829756
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prior studies show that intramuscular injection and particle-mediated epidermal delivery of xenogeneic melanosomal antigens (tyrosinase or Tyr, gp100) induce CD8(+) T cell responses to the syngeneic protein. To further define the optimal vaccination strategy, we conducted a phase I study of in vivo electroporation (EP) of a murine Tyr DNA vaccine (pINGmuTyr) in malignant melanoma patients.

Methods: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1, A2, A24 or B35 stage IIb-IV melanoma patients received up to five doses of the mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccine by EP every three weeks at dose levels of 0.2 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1.5 mg per injection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected, cultured with a peptide pool containing eight HLA class I-restricted Tyr-specific T-cell epitopes, and analyzed by HLA-A*0101-restricted tetramers and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS).

Results: Twenty-four patients received ≥1 dose of the pINGmuTyr vaccine; PBMCs from 21 patients who completed all five doses were available for Tyr immune assays. The only common toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction. Six of 15 patients (40%) in the 1.5 mg dose cohort developed Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell responses following stimulation, defined as a ≥3 standard deviation increase in baseline reactivity by tetramer or ICS assays. No Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell response was detected in the 0.2 mg and 0.5 mg dose cohort patients. Epitope spreading of CD8(+) T cell response to NY-ESO-1 was observed in one patient with vitiligo. One patient subsequently received ipilimumab and developed an enhanced Tyr-reactive response with polyfunctional cytokine profile. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, median survival has not been reached.

Conclusions: A regimen of five immunizations with pINGmuTyr administered by EP was found to be safe and resulted in Tyr-reactive immune responses in six of 15 patients at 1.5 mg dose cohort.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00471133.

Citing Articles

Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.

Zhou Y, Wei Y, Tian X, Wei X J Hematol Oncol. 2025; 18(1):18.

PMID: 39962549 PMC: 11834487. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-025-01670-w.


APAVAC Immunotherapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of a Canine Mucosal Melanoma.

Rinaldi V, Bongiovanni L, Crisi P, Vignoli M, Peli R, Masci S Vet Sci. 2024; 11(12).

PMID: 39728968 PMC: 11680214. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11120628.


Exosome-based immunotherapy as an innovative therapeutic approach in melanoma.

Babaei S, Fadaee M, Abbasi-Kenarsari H, Shanehbandi D, Kazemi T Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):527.

PMID: 39482766 PMC: 11526674. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01906-1.


Review of Role of Surgery with Electroporation in Melanoma: Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, and Gene Delivery.

Ahmad M, Walsh A, Kirane A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999394 PMC: 11242408. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133828.


Anti-tumor activity of intratumoral xenogeneic urothelial cell monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in syngeneic murine models of bladder cancer.

Huang C, Lu H, Shyr C Am J Cancer Res. 2023; 13(6):2285-2306.

PMID: 37424801 PMC: 10326576.


References
1.
Perales M, Yuan J, Powel S, Gallardo H, Rasalan T, Gonzalez C . Phase I/II study of GM-CSF DNA as an adjuvant for a multipeptide cancer vaccine in patients with advanced melanoma. Mol Ther. 2008; 16(12):2022-9. PMC: 3909666. DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.196. View

2.
Best S, Peng S, Juang C, Hung C, Hannaman D, Saunders J . Administration of HPV DNA vaccine via electroporation elicits the strongest CD8+ T cell immune responses compared to intramuscular injection and intradermal gene gun delivery. Vaccine. 2009; 27(40):5450-9. PMC: 2745985. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.005. View

3.
Sivendran S, Glodny B, Pan M, Merad M, Saenger Y . Melanoma immunotherapy. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010; 77(6):620-42. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20215. View

4.
Ginsberg B, Gallardo H, Rasalan T, Adamow M, Mu Z, Tandon S . Immunologic response to xenogeneic gp100 DNA in melanoma patients: comparison of particle-mediated epidermal delivery with intramuscular injection. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16(15):4057-65. PMC: 4241567. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1093. View

5.
Coban C, Kobiyama K, Aoshi T, Takeshita F, Horii T, Akira S . Novel strategies to improve DNA vaccine immunogenicity. Curr Gene Ther. 2011; 11(6):479-84. DOI: 10.2174/156652311798192815. View