» Articles » PMID: 24816083

Extraoperative Neurostimulation Mapping: Results from an International Survey of Epilepsy Surgery Programs

Overview
Journal Epilepsia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 May 13
PMID 24816083
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Extraoperative electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) to identify functional cortex is performed prior to neurosurgical resection at epilepsy surgery programs worldwide. However, the procedure remains unstandardized, with no established clinical guidelines. We sought to determine the current range in ESM practice parameters across established epilepsy surgery centers.

Methods: We developed and distributed a 31-question survey to 220 epilepsy centers worldwide regarding current practice parameters of ESM. Questions addressed preoperative assessment, technical stimulation parameters, language testing protocols, criteria for identification of positive or negative functional sites, management of mapping complications, and postoperative functional outcome.

Results: Survey responses were obtained from 56 centers. These revealed marked practice variability in virtually all aspects of the ESM procedure. These aspects included critical procedure components such as electrical stimulation settings, the types of language functions tested, the operational definition of a language error, size of surgical resection margin, cortical locations mapped for language, testing in the presence of afterdischarges, and medical management of mapping complications. Forty-one percent of centers reported at least one persistent adverse language outcome despite preserving all eloquent sites defined by their stimulation mapping procedure.

Significance: The striking variations in practice across centers are likely to influence mapping results, which directly affect the boundaries of cortical resection and, consequently, might worsen either seizure or functional outcomes. Clearly, adverse functional outcomes occur despite mapping procedures that were perceived to be adequate. Investigation of critical technical and procedural aspects of stimulation mapping is warranted, with the ultimate goal of establishing empirically based practice guidelines to improve the safety and efficacy of ESM and resective epilepsy surgery. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

Citing Articles

Level I and II deficits-A clinical survey on international practice of awake craniotomy and definitions of postoperative "major" and "minor" deficits.

Vooijs M, Robertson F, Blitz S, Jungk C, Krieg S, Schucht P Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae206.

PMID: 39687790 PMC: 11647522. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae206.


Response to "Letter to the Editor. The weight of functional MRI to predict surgery-induced risk after tumor resection: enough to be safe?".

Polczynska M, Benjamin C, Bookheimer S J Neurosurg. 2024; 137(1):314-315.

PMID: 39314541 PMC: 11419400.


Language lateralization mapping (reversibly) masked by non-dominant focal epilepsy: a case report.

Abarrategui B, Mariani V, Rizzi M, Berta L, Scarpa P, Zauli F Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1254779.

PMID: 37900727 PMC: 10600519. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1254779.


Challenges and Suggested Solutions for Functional Neurosurgery Practitioners and Patients in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.

Aleid A Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e44323.

PMID: 37654904 PMC: 10468143. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44323.


An international survey of SEEG cortical stimulation practices.

Cockle E, Rayner G, Malpas C, Alpitsis R, Rheims S, OBrien T Epilepsia Open. 2023; 8(3):1084-1095.

PMID: 37437189 PMC: 10472359. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12790.


References
1.
Picht T, Krieg S, Sollmann N, Rosler J, Niraula B, Neuvonen T . A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72(5):808-19. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182889e01. View

2.
Hamberger M . Cortical language mapping in epilepsy: a critical review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007; 17(4):477-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-007-9046-6. View

3.
Hamberger M, Goodman R, Perrine K, Tamny T . Anatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex. Neurology. 2001; 56(1):56-61. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.1.56. View

4.
Wellmer J, Weber C, Mende M, von der Groeben F, Urbach H, Clusmann H . Multitask electrical stimulation for cortical language mapping: hints for necessity and economic mode of application. Epilepsia. 2009; 50(10):2267-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02192.x. View

5.
McCreery D, AGNEW W . Changes in extracellular potassium and calcium concentration and neural activity during prolonged electrical stimulation of the cat cerebral cortex at defined charge densities. Exp Neurol. 1983; 79(2):371-96. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90220-0. View