» Articles » PMID: 24790210

Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) Microscopy Reveals Nanoscale Defects in the Developmental Trajectory of Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 May 3
PMID 24790210
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dendritic spines are basic units of neuronal information processing and their structure is closely reflected in their function. Defects in synaptic development are common in neurodevelopmental disorders, making detailed knowledge of age-dependent changes in spine morphology essential for understanding disease mechanisms. However, little is known about the functionally important fine-morphological structures, such as spine necks, due to the limited spatial resolution of conventional light microscopy. Using stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED), we examined spine morphology at the nanoscale during normal development in mice, and tested the hypothesis that it is impaired in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome (FXS). In contrast to common belief, we find that, in normal development, spine heads become smaller, while their necks become wider and shorter, indicating that synapse compartmentalization decreases substantially with age. In the mouse model of FXS, this developmental trajectory is largely intact, with only subtle differences that are dependent on age and brain region. Together, our findings challenge current dogmas of both normal spine development as well as spine dysgenesis in FXS, highlighting the importance of super-resolution imaging approaches for elucidating structure-function relationships of dendritic spines.

Citing Articles

Clinical parameters affect the structure and function of superficial pyramidal neurons in the adult human neocortex.

Lenz M, Kruse P, Eichler A, Straehle J, Hemeling H, Stohr P Brain Commun. 2024; 6(5):fcae351.

PMID: 39474044 PMC: 11518857. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae351.


From wings to whiskers to stem cells: why every model matters in fragile X syndrome research.

Sandoval S, Mendez-Albelo N, Xu Z, Zhao X J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):30.

PMID: 38872088 PMC: 11177515. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09545-w.


Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research.

Li B, Sumera A, Booker S, McCullagh E ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023; 14(9):1561-1572.

PMID: 37070364 PMC: 10161226. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062.


Mouse models of fragile X-related disorders.

Willemsen R, Kooy R Dis Model Mech. 2023; 16(2).

PMID: 36692473 PMC: 9903145. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.049485.


FMRP and CYFIP1 at the Synapse and Their Role in Psychiatric Vulnerability.

Clifton N, Thomas K, Wilkinson L, Hall J, Trent S Complex Psychiatry. 2021; 6(1-2):5-19.

PMID: 34883502 PMC: 7673588. DOI: 10.1159/000506858.


References
1.
Pan F, Aldridge G, Greenough W, Gan W . Dendritic spine instability and insensitivity to modulation by sensory experience in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(41):17768-73. PMC: 2955121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012496107. View

2.
Nusser Z, Lujan R, Laube G, Roberts J, Molnar E, Somogyi P . Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron. 1998; 21(3):545-59. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80565-6. View

3.
Peters A . The small pyramidal neuron of the rat cerebral cortex. The perikaryon, dendrites and spines. Am J Anat. 1970; 127(4):321-55. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001270402. View

4.
Hell S, Wichmann J . Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt Lett. 2009; 19(11):780-2. DOI: 10.1364/ol.19.000780. View

5.
Benavides-Piccione R, Ballesteros-Yanez I, DeFelipe J, Yuste R . Cortical area and species differences in dendritic spine morphology. J Neurocytol. 2003; 31(3-5):337-46. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024134312173. View