» Articles » PMID: 24779659

Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic, Mercury and Copper Levels in Chinese Yunnan Pu'er Tea

Overview
Date 2014 May 1
PMID 24779659
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Yunnan region of China produces a distinctive variety of Pu'er tea, which is consequently labeled as a Chinese geographic indication product. In this study, the safety of Chinese Yunnan Pu'er tea with regard to heavy metal content was evaluated in 30 different brands of Pu'er tea, including 150 commercial samples. Metal levels in the Pu'er tea samples followed the order: copper (12-22 µg/g) > lead (0.26-3.2 µg/g) > arsenic (0.035-0.24 µg/g) > cadmium (0.0059-0.085 µg/g) > mercury (<0.010 µg/g). Mercury was not detected in 17 of the brands of Pu'er tea. Metal-to-metal correlation studies showed that there were no significant correlation between metal pairs. Based on current safety standards, the low levels of metals detected in these Pu'er tea samples mean they are safe for human consumption.

Citing Articles

Determination of Pb (Lead), Cd (Cadmium), Cr (Chromium), Cu (Copper), and Ni (Nickel) in Chinese tea with high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry.

Zhong W, Ren T, Zhao L J Food Drug Anal. 2017; 24(1):46-55.

PMID: 28911408 PMC: 9345429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.04.010.


Determination of heavy metals in the soils of tea plantations and in fresh and processed tea leaves: an evaluation of six digestion methods.

Rashid M, Fardous Z, Chowdhury M, Alam M, Bari M, Moniruzzaman M Chem Cent J. 2016; 10:7.

PMID: 26900397 PMC: 4759960. DOI: 10.1186/s13065-016-0154-3.


(+)-Catechin inhibition of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus in swine testicular cells is involved its antioxidation.

Liang W, He L, Ning P, Lin J, Li H, Lin Z Res Vet Sci. 2015; 103:28-33.

PMID: 26679792 PMC: 7111882. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.09.009.


Heavy metal contents of organically produced, harvested, and dried fruit samples from Kayseri, Turkey.

Soylak M, Cihan Z, Yilmaz E Environ Monit Assess. 2012; 185(3):2577-83.

PMID: 22736211 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2741-7.