» Articles » PMID: 24778243

Cattle Ranching Intensification in Brazil Can Reduce Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sparing Land from Deforestation

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Apr 30
PMID 24778243
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examines whether policies to encourage cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can abate global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by sparing land from deforestation. We use an economic model of global land use to investigate, from 2010 to 2030, the global agricultural outcomes, land use changes, and GHG abatement resulting from two potential Brazilian policies: a tax on cattle from conventional pasture and a subsidy for cattle from semi-intensive pasture. We find that under either policy, Brazil could achieve considerable sparing of forests and abatement of GHGs, in line with its national policy targets. The land spared, particularly under the tax, is far less than proportional to the productivity increased. However, the tax, despite prompting less adoption of semi-intensive ranching, delivers slightly more forest sparing and GHG abatement than the subsidy. This difference is explained by increased deforestation associated with increased beef consumption under the subsidy and reduced deforestation associated with reduced beef consumption under the tax. Complementary policies to directly limit deforestation could help limit these effects. GHG abatement from either the tax or subsidy appears inexpensive but, over time, the tax would become cheaper than the subsidy. A revenue-neutral combination of the policies could be an element of a sustainable development strategy for Brazil and other emerging economies seeking to balance agricultural development and forest protection.

Citing Articles

Enhanced agricultural carbon sinks provide benefits for farmers and the climate.

Frank S, Lessa Derci Augustynczik A, Havlik P, Boere E, Ermolieva T, Fricko O Nat Food. 2024; 5(9):742-753.

PMID: 39313684 PMC: 11420069. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01039-1.


Agricultural intensification and childhood cancer in Brazil.

Skidmore M, Sims K, Gibbs H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(45):e2306003120.

PMID: 37903255 PMC: 10636353. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306003120.


Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives.

Kozicka M, Havlik P, Valin H, Wollenberg E, Deppermann A, Leclere D Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5316.

PMID: 37699877 PMC: 10497520. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2.


Economic-environmental assessment of silvo-pastoral systems in Colombia: An ecosystem service perspective.

Sandoval D, Florez J, Enciso Valencia K, Sotelo Cabrera M, Stefan B Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e19082.

PMID: 37636404 PMC: 10448473. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19082.


Changes in global food consumption increase GHG emissions despite efficiency gains along global supply chains.

Li Y, Zhong H, Shan Y, Hang Y, Wang D, Zhou Y Nat Food. 2023; 4(6):483-495.

PMID: 37322300 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00768-z.


References
1.
Alexandratos N . World food and agriculture: outlook for the medium and longer term. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(11):5908-14. PMC: 34205. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5908. View

2.
Angelsen A . Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(46):19639-44. PMC: 2993393. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912014107. View

3.
Lapola D, Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Koch J, Koelking C . Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(8):3388-93. PMC: 2840431. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907318107. View

4.
Herrero M, Havlik P, Valin H, Notenbaert A, Rufino M, Thornton P . Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(52):20888-93. PMC: 3876224. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308149110. View

5.
Cederberg C, Persson U, Neovius K, Molander S, Clift R . Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(5):1773-9. DOI: 10.1021/es103240z. View