» Articles » PMID: 24760013

Influence of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the Right Angular Gyrus on Brain Activity During Rest

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 25
PMID 24760013
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although numerous studies examined resting-state networks (RSN) in the human brain, so far little is known about how activity within RSN might be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation applied over parietal cortex. Investigating changes in RSN in response to parietal cortex stimulation might tell us more about how non-invasive techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulate intrinsic brain activity, and further elaborate our understanding of how the resting brain responds to external stimulation. Here we examined how activity within the canonical RSN changed in response to anodal tDCS applied over the right angular gyrus (AG). We hypothesized that changes in resting-state activity can be induced by a single tDCS session and detected with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Significant differences between two fMRI sessions (pre-tDCS and post-tDCS) were found in several RSN, including the cerebellar, medial visual, sensorimotor, right frontoparietal, and executive control RSN as well as the default mode and the task positive network. The present results revealed decreased and increased RSN activity following tDCS. Decreased RSN activity following tDCS was found in bilateral primary and secondary visual areas, and in the right putamen. Increased RSN activity following tDCS was widely distributed across the brain, covering thalamic, frontal, parietal and occipital regions. From these exploratory results we conclude that a single session of anodal tDCS over the right AG is sufficient to induce large-scale changes in resting-state activity. These changes were localized in sensory and cognitive areas, covering regions close to and distant from the stimulation site.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Cha B, Kim J, Kim J, Choi J, Choi J, Kim K Front Neurol. 2022; 13:813597.

PMID: 35392634 PMC: 8980431. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.813597.


Therapeutic Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness.

Aloi D, Della Rocchetta A, Ditchfield A, Coulborn S, Fernandez-Espejo D Front Neurol. 2021; 12:632572.

PMID: 33897592 PMC: 8058460. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632572.


Enhancing creativity by altering the frontoparietal control network functioning using transcranial direct current stimulation.

Lifshitz-Ben-Basat A, Mashal N Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(2):613-626.

PMID: 33388813 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06023-2.


Spectral guided sparse inverse covariance estimation of metabolic networks in Parkinson's disease.

Spetsieris P, Eidelberg D Neuroimage. 2020; 226:117568.

PMID: 33246128 PMC: 8409106. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117568.


Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Bikson M, Esmaeilpour Z, Adair D, Kronberg G, Tyler W, Antal A Brain Stimul. 2019; 12(6):1349-1366.

PMID: 31358456 PMC: 6851475. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.010.


References
1.
Nitsche M, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N . Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 97(4):3109-17. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006. View

2.
Beckmann C, Smith S . Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004; 23(2):137-52. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2003.822821. View

3.
Oostendorp T, Hengeveld Y, Wolters C, Stinstra J, van Elswijk G, Stegeman D . Modeling transcranial DC stimulation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2008:4226-9. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650142. View

4.
Antal A, Kovacs G, Chaieb L, Cziraki C, Paulus W, Greenlee M . Cathodal stimulation of human MT+ leads to elevated fMRI signal: a tDCS-fMRI study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2012; 30(3):255-63. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2012-110208. View

5.
Downar J, Crawley A, Mikulis D, Davis K . A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):277-83. DOI: 10.1038/72991. View