What Young People Want from Health-related Online Resources: a Focus Group Study

Overview

Journal J Youth Stud

Date 2014 Apr 22

PMID 24748849

Citations 33

Authors

Gillian Fergie

Kate Hunt

Shona Hilton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The growth of the Internet as an information source about health, particularly amongst young people, is well established. The aim of this study was to explore young people's perceptions and experiences of engaging with health-related online content, particularly through social media websites. Between February and July 2011 nine focus groups were facilitated across Scotland with young people aged between 14 and 18 years. Health-related user-generated content seems to be appreciated by young people as a useful, if not always trustworthy, source of accounts of other people's experiences. The reliability and quality of both user-generated content and official factual content about health appear to be concerns for young people, and they employ specialised strategies for negotiating both areas of the online environment. Young people's engagement with health online is a dynamic area for research. Their perceptions and experiences of health-related content seem based on their wider familiarity with the online environment and, as the online environment develops, so too do young people's strategies and conventions for accessing it.

Citing Articles

Conceptualization of health literacy from the perspective of children and adolescents - a meta-ethnography.

Seidl K, Stauch L, Affengruber L, Sommer I, Wahl A, Rojatz D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5697.

PMID: 39962102 PMC: 11833097. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89371-9.

Web-Based Content on Diet and Nutrition Written in Japanese: Infodemiology Study Based on Google Trends and Google Search.

Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Kimoto N, Onodera H, Oono F, McCaffrey T JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e47101.

PMID: 37971794 PMC: 10690527. DOI: 10.2196/47101.

Eating Disorders in Youth with Chronic Health Conditions: Clinical Strategies for Early Recognition and Prevention.

Kumar M Nutrients. 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37686703 PMC: 10490114. DOI: 10.3390/nu15173672.

Self-management, self-care, and self-help in adolescents with emotional problems: a scoping review.

Town R, Hayes D, March A, Fonagy P, Stapley E Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023; 33(9):2929-2956.

PMID: 36641785 PMC: 9840811. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-02134-z.

Development and usage of a health recommendation web tool (HeaRT) designed to inform women of personalized preventive health recommendations.

Greenberg K, Poupko T, Sorotzkin D, Keidar O, Zwas D Internet Interv. 2023; 31:100599.

PMID: 36618777 PMC: 9813537. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100599.

References

Ekberg J, Ericson L, Timpka T, Eriksson H, Nordfeldt S, Hanberger L . Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories. J Med Syst. 2010; 34(2):107-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9222-0. View

Benigeri M, Pluye P . Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. Health Promot Int. 2003; 18(4):381-6. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dag409. View

Jacobson L, Mellanby A, Donovan C, Taylor B, Tripp J . Teenagers' views on general practice consultations and other medical advice. The Adolescent Working Group, RCGP. Fam Pract. 2000; 17(2):156-8. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.156. View

Adams S . Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": an inter-disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79(6):391-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006. View

Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle R . Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatol Clin. 2009; 27(2):133-6, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010. View

Gray N, Klein J, Noyce P, Sesselberg T, Cantrill J . The Internet: a window on adolescent health literacy. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37(3):243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.023. View

Williams A, Merten M . A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: implications for future research and intervention. Adolescence. 2008; 43(170):253-74. View

Moreno M, Brockman L, Rogers C, Christakis D . An evaluation of the distribution of sexual references among "Top 8" MySpace friends. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47(4):418-20. PMC: 2946400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.015. View

Skinner H, Biscope S, Poland B, Goldberg E . How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 5(4):e32. PMC: 1550577. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e32. View

10.

Nettleton S, Burrows R, OMalley L . The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol Health Illn. 2005; 27(7):972-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00466.x. View

11.

Moreno M, Briner L, Williams A, Walker L, Christakis D . Real use or "real cool": adolescents speak out about displayed alcohol references on social networking websites. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45(4):420-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.015. View

12.

Moreno M, VanderStoep A, Parks M, Zimmerman F, Kurth A, Christakis D . Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: a randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.502. View

13.

McNab C . What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bull World Health Organ. 2009; 87(8):566. PMC: 2733259. DOI: 10.2471/blt.09.066712. View

14.

Fox N, Ward K, ORourke A . The 'expert patient': empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(6):1299-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005. View

15.

Buhi E, Daley E, Fuhrmann H, Smith S . An observational study of how young people search for online sexual health information. J Am Coll Health. 2009; 58(2):101-11. DOI: 10.1080/07448480903221236. View

16.

Barker K . Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: the case of contested illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2008; 49(1):20-36. DOI: 10.1177/002214650804900103. View

17.

Selman T, Prakash T, Khan K . Quality of health information for cervical cancer treatment on the internet. BMC Womens Health. 2006; 6:9. PMC: 1550221. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-6-9. View

18.

Griffiths R, Casswell S . Intoxigenic digital spaces? Youth, social networking sites and alcohol marketing. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010; 29(5):525-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00178.x. View

19.

Buhi E, Daley E, Oberne A, Smith S, Schneider T, Fuhrmann H . Quality and accuracy of sexual health information web sites visited by young people. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47(2):206-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.002. View

20.

Purcell G, Wilson P, Delamothe T . The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ. 2002; 324(7337):557-8. PMC: 1122494. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.557. View