» Articles » PMID: 30046453

What Can We Learn from Second Generation Digital Natives? A Qualitative Study of Undergraduates' Views of Digital Health at One London University

Overview
Journal Digit Health
Date 2018 Jul 27
PMID 30046453
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We live in a digital age and opportunities within healthcare are increasing, ranging from patient portals to wearable devices. Today's undergraduates are second generation digital natives and are at a critical point of becoming more autonomous in their healthcare interactions. This study aims to understand their experiences of both digital and broader healthcare. This will enable a better understanding of implications for national policy, individual healthcare organisations and further research.

Methods: Undergraduates aged 18-21 participated in individual interviews or focus groups. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. Negative member checking and feedback on emerging themes from both participants and experts were used to increase the validity of the study.

Results: Twenty-four undergraduates participated in the study, including a high proportion of international students. Thematic analysis revealed 16 themes. Six key themes explored in this paper are: generation gap; impact on healthcare professionals (HCPs); use of technology to replace or enhance HCP interactions; use of technology to support administration/transactional activities; paper vs electronic; and personally held health and fitness data.

Conclusion: This paper highlights recommendations for the undergraduate cohort and wider populations including better articulation of benefits, making digital options more personalised and interactive, and raising awareness of dangerous 'obsessive' behaviour around health and fitness apps. Some of our findings challenge the assumption that this generation will automatically accept digital initiatives, including the importance this cohort continues to place on face-to-face interactions. In response, we offer some suggestions to improve awareness, utilisation and acceptance of digital health.

Citing Articles

Needs and Expectations of Nurse-Led Digital Support Among Parents of Children in Child Health Care.

Valan L, Isaksson U, Hornsten A Child Care Health Dev. 2025; 51(2):e70032.

PMID: 39953699 PMC: 11829083. DOI: 10.1111/cch.70032.


Public Understanding and Expectations of Digital Health Evidence Generation: Focus Group Study.

Bondaronek P, Li J, Potts H JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9():e56523.

PMID: 39864815 PMC: 11769687. DOI: 10.2196/56523.


Pilot implementation of a telehealth course for health professions students.

Marino R, Capurro D, Merolli M BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):963.

PMID: 39232771 PMC: 11373492. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05931-z.


Exploring undergraduate nursing students' experiences towards home-based learning as pedagogy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive qualitative exploration.

Hu Y, Ow Yong J, Chng M, Li Z, Goh Y BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):13.

PMID: 34983507 PMC: 8724644. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00788-9.


Gender, education, and digital generations as determinants of attitudes toward health information for health workers in West Java, Indonesia.

Dida S, Hafiar H, Kadiyono A, Lukman S Heliyon. 2021; 7(1):e05916.

PMID: 33490678 PMC: 7810767. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05916.


References
1.
Swan M . Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009; 6(2):492-525. PMC: 2672358. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph6020492. View

2.
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

3.
Fergie G, Hunt K, Hilton S . What young people want from health-related online resources: a focus group study. J Youth Stud. 2014; 16(5):579-596. PMC: 3982905. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2012.744811. View

4.
Hoy M . Personal Activity Trackers and the Quantified Self. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016; 35(1):94-100. DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2016.1117300. View

5.
Klein J, McNulty M, Flatau C . Adolescents' access to care: teenagers' self-reported use of services and perceived access to confidential care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152(7):676-82. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.152.7.676. View