Definition of Brucella A and M Epitopes by Monoclonal Typing Reagents and Synthetic Oligosaccharides
Overview
Affiliations
The paradigm that Brucella A and M epitopes are simultaneously expressed on single cells and within one antigen molecule was reinvestigated by using polysaccharide-specific murine monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies were generated to the M antigen of Brucella melitensis 16M. Chemically defined lipopolysaccharides and O polysaccharides from Brucella abortus 1119-3, B. melitensis 16M, and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 were used to dissect the binding profiles of the B. melitensis antibodies and an additional set of antibodies available from a B. abortus fusion experiment. Binding specificities were rationalized in terms of prototype A- and M-antigen structures, an interpretation supported by competitive binding studies with O polysaccharides and synthetic oligosaccharide analogs of the A and M antigens. Three binding patterns were characterized. Antibodies specific for the A antigen required five contiguous alpha 1,2-linked 4,6-dideoxy-4-formamido-D-mannopyranosyl residues, while antibodies with equal affinities for A or M epitopes were effectively inhibited by alpha 1,2-linked tri- or tetrasaccharides. Specificity for the M epitope correlated with binding of a critical disaccharide element alpha-D-Rha4NFo(1----3)alpha-D-Rha4NFo bracketed by alpha 1,2-linked residues. The binding profiles of Brucella monoclonal antibodies were consistent with the concept of simultaneous expression of A and M epitopes within a single molecule. A epitopes were present in the M antigen, and the discovery of isolated alpha 1,3 linkages in the A antigen suggests that M epitopes occur in all A antigens. Three monoclonal antibodies are proposed as standard reagents for the detection and identification of Brucella A and M antigens.
A bioconjugate vaccine against produced by engineered .
Li S, Huang J, Wang K, Liu Y, Guo Y, Li X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1121074.
PMID: 36911199 PMC: 9995886. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1121074.
Rohokale R, Guo Z ACS Infect Dis. 2023; 9(2):178-212.
PMID: 36706246 PMC: 9930202. DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00559.
Duncombe L, Howells L, Haughey A, Taylor A, Kaveh D, Erdenlig Gyrbilek S Microorganisms. 2022; 10(4).
PMID: 35456759 PMC: 9024974. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040708.
Importance of brucellosis control programs of livestock on the improvement of one health.
Dadar M, Tiwari R, Sharun K, Dhama K Vet Q. 2021; 41(1):137-151.
PMID: 33618618 PMC: 7946044. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2021.1894501.
The Role of Neutrophils in Brucellosis.
Moreno E, Barquero-Calvo E Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020; 84(4).
PMID: 33055283 PMC: 7567297. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00048-20.