» Articles » PMID: 24736706

Meat Consumption and Risk of Oral Cavity and Oropharynx Cancer: a Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 17
PMID 24736706
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: High meat consumption, especially red and processed meat consumption is associated with an increased risk of several cancers, however, evidence for oral cavity and oropharynx cancer is limited. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to determine the association between intakes of total meat, processed meat, red meat, and white meat, and the risk of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer.

Methods: Electronic search of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central database was conducted to select relevant studies. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to estimate summary relative risks (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Potential sources of heterogeneity were detected by meta-regression. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis were also performed.

Results: 12 case-control studies and one cohort study were included in the analyses, including 501,730 subjects and 4,104 oral cavity and oropharynx cancer cases. Pooled results indicated that high consumption of total meat, red meat, and white meat were not significantly associated with increased risk of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer (RR = 1.14, 95% CI[0.78-1.68]; RR = 1.05, 95% CI[0.66, 1.66] and RR = 0.81, 95% CI[0.54, 1.22], respectively), while the high consumption of processed meat was significantly associated with a 91% increased risk of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer (RR = 1.91, 95% CI [1.19-3.06]). Sensitivity analysis indicated that no significant variation in combined RR by excluding any of the study, confirming the stability of present results.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis suggested that high consumption of processed meat was significantly associated with an increased risk of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer, while there was no significantly association between total meat, red meat or white meat and the risk of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer. More prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm these associations.

Citing Articles

Early identification of people at high risk of oral cancer-A review of existing risk prediction models.

Mocherla M, Krishnappa P J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(8):2851-2856.

PMID: 39228608 PMC: 11368278. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_117_24.


Connecting the dots: investigating the link between environmental, genetic, and epigenetic influences in metabolomic alterations in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Gupta I, Badrzadeh F, Tsentalovich Y, Gaykalova D J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):239.

PMID: 39169426 PMC: 11337877. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03141-5.


The Risk of Oral Cancer and the High Consumption of Thermally Processed Meat Containing Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Compounds.

Bulanda S, Lau K, Nowak A, Lyko-Morawska D, Kotylak A, Janoszka B Nutrients. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38613117 PMC: 11013896. DOI: 10.3390/nu16071084.


CD36: The Bridge between Lipids and Tumors.

Zhou X, Su M, Lu J, Li D, Niu X, Wang Y Molecules. 2024; 29(2).

PMID: 38276607 PMC: 10819246. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29020531.


Dietary meat mutagens intake and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reng Q, Zhu L, Feng L, Li Y, Zhu Y, Wang T Front Nutr. 2022; 9:962688.

PMID: 36211500 PMC: 9537819. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.962688.


References
1.
Rajkumar T, Sridhar H, Balaram P, Vaccarella S, Gajalakshmi V, Nandakumar A . Oral cancer in Southern India: the influence of body size, diet, infections and sexual practices. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003; 12(2):135-43. DOI: 10.1097/00008469-200304000-00007. View

2.
Wang C, Jiang H . Meat intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol. 2011; 29(2):848-55. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-9985-x. View

3.
Begg C, Mazumdar M . Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4):1088-101. View

4.
Kazerouni N, Sinha R, Hsu C, Greenberg A, Rothman N . Analysis of 200 food items for benzo[a]pyrene and estimation of its intake in an epidemiologic study. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001; 39(5):423-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00158-7. View

5.
De Stefani E, Boffetta P, Ronco A, Deneo-Pellegrini H, Correa P, Acosta G . Processed meat consumption and risk of cancer: a multisite case-control study in Uruguay. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(9):1584-8. PMC: 3493769. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.433. View