» Articles » PMID: 24723237

Post-contrast T1-weighted Sequences in Pediatric Abdominal Imaging: Comparative Analysis of Three Different Sequences and Imaging Approach

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2014 Apr 12
PMID 24723237
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Post-contrast T1-weighted imaging is an essential component of a comprehensive pediatric abdominopelvic MR examination. However, consistent good image quality is challenging, as respiratory motion in sedated children can substantially degrade the image quality.

Objective: To compare the image quality of three different post-contrast T1-weighted imaging techniques-standard three-dimensional gradient-echo (3-D-GRE), magnetization-prepared gradient-recall echo (MP-GRE) and 3-D-GRE with radial data sampling (radial 3-D-GRE)-acquired in pediatric patients younger than 5 years of age.

Materials And Methods: Sixty consecutive exams performed in 51 patients (23 females, 28 males; mean age 2.5 ± 1.4 years) constituted the final study population. Thirty-nine scans were performed at 3 T and 21 scans were performed at 1.5 T. Two different reviewers independently and blindly qualitatively evaluated all sequences to determine image quality and extent of artifacts.

Results: MP-GRE and radial 3-D-GRE sequences had the least respiratory motion (P < 0.0001). Standard 3-D-GRE sequences displayed the lowest average score ratings in hepatic and pancreatic edge definition, hepatic vessel clarity and overall image quality. Radial 3-D-GRE sequences showed the highest scores ratings in overall image quality.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results support the preference of fat-suppressed radial 3-D-GRE as the best post-contrast T1-weighted imaging approach for patients under the age of 5 years, when dynamic imaging is not essential.

Citing Articles

Advanced imaging techniques in pediatric body MRI.

Courtier J, Rao A, Anupindi S Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 47(5):522-533.

PMID: 28409251 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3778-0.

References
1.
Peters D, Botnar R, Kissinger K, Yeon S, Appelbaum E, Manning W . Inversion recovery radial MRI with interleaved projection sets. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55(5):1150-6. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20865. View

2.
Kim K, Lee J, Jeon Y, Kang S, Baek J, Han J . Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen and chest using a radial gradient echo sequence with K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC). Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(5):1352-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2699-4. View

3.
Chandarana H, Block K, Winfeld M, Lala S, Mazori D, Giuffrida E . Free-breathing contrast-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging with radial k-space sampling for paediatric abdominopelvic MRI. Eur Radiol. 2013; 24(2):320-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3026-4. View

4.
Xue Y, Yu J, Kang H, Englander S, Rosen M, Song H . Automatic coil selection for streak artifact reduction in radial MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(2):470-6. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23023. View

5.
Ramalho M, Heredia V, de Campos R, Dale B, Azevedo R, Semelka R . In-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo imaging in abdominal studies: intra-individual comparison of three different techniques. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53(4):441-9. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110695. View