» Articles » PMID: 21591019

Comparison of a Single Shot T1-weighted In- and Out-of-phase Magnetization Prepared Gradient Recalled Echo with a Standard Two-dimensional Gradient Recalled Echo: Preliminary Findings

Overview
Date 2011 May 19
PMID 21591019
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare in-phase (IP)/out-of-phase (OP) single shot magnetization-prepared gradient-recalled-echo (MP-GRE) with a standard two-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo (2D-GRE), and to compare image quality of MP-GRE in cooperative and noncooperative subjects.

Materials And Methods: Ninety-six consecutive subjects (52 males, 44 females; mean age, 53.2 ± 16.7 years), both cooperative (n = 73) and noncooperative (n = 23) subjects who had MRI examinations including precontrast T1-weighted IP/OP MP-GRE with or without IP/OP 2D-GRE were included in the study. The sequences were independently qualitatively evaluated by two radiologists. Quantitative analysis of liver fat index, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and liver-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was also performed. Data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: The visual detection of the presence or absence of liver steatosis showed no differences between 2D-GRE and MP-GRE imaging (k = 1). Minor differences were observed on image quality between MP-GRE and 2D-GRE in cooperative subjects, and between MP-GRE sequences performed in cooperative and noncooperative subjects. Liver fat index results were strongly positively correlated (r = .98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97 to 0.98; P < .0001). Intercept (.14; 95% CI .13 to .15; P < .0001) and slope (.83; 95% CI .79 to .86; P < .0001) were statistically significant.

Conclusion: IP/OP MP-GRE and 2D-GRE comparably demonstrate the presence or absence of hepatic steatosis. Image quality of MP-GRE was also comparable to 2D-GRE, and was not substantially adversely affected if subjects were unable to cooperate with breathholding instructions.

Citing Articles

Focal liver lesions: Practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Matos A, Velloni F, Ramalho M, AlObaidy M, Rajapaksha A, Semelka R World J Hepatol. 2015; 7(16):1987-2008.

PMID: 26261689 PMC: 4528273. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i16.1987.


New imaging strategies using a motion-resistant liver sequence in uncooperative patients.

Kim B, Lee K, Goh M Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:142658.

PMID: 25243115 PMC: 4163429. DOI: 10.1155/2014/142658.


Post-contrast T1-weighted sequences in pediatric abdominal imaging: comparative analysis of three different sequences and imaging approach.

Roque A, Ramalho M, AlObaidy M, Heredia V, Burke L, de Campos R Pediatr Radiol. 2014; 44(10):1258-65.

PMID: 24723237 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-2969-1.