» Articles » PMID: 24698200

Does a Large Infant Head or a Short Perineal Body Increase the Risk of Obstetrical Perineal Trauma?

Overview
Journal Birth
Date 2014 Apr 5
PMID 24698200
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery can have significant long-term consequences. It is unknown if a larger infant head circumference or smaller maternal perineal anatomy are risk factors for perineal trauma after vaginal delivery.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women. Data collected included maternal characteristics, antepartum Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements of the perineal body and genital hiatus, labor characteristics, perineal trauma, and infant head circumference. Perineal trauma was defined as trauma that extended into the muscles of the perineum (second-degree or deeper). Univariate and multivariate logistic models were created to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI).

Results: We observed 448 vaginal births. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between infant head circumference at birth and perineal trauma: OR 1.22 for each increase of 1 cm in head circumference (95% CI 1.05-1.43). There was no association between perineal body or genital hiatus length and perineal trauma.

Conclusions: In nulliparous low-risk women a larger infant head circumference at birth increases the likelihood of perineal trauma, although the effect is modest. Antenatal perineal body and genital hiatus measurements do not predict perineal trauma. These results do not support alteration in mode of delivery or other obstetric practices.

Citing Articles

Ultrasonographic study of female perineal body and its supportive function on pelvic floor.

Zhou M, Shui W, Bai W, Wu X, Ying T Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1176360.

PMID: 37564038 PMC: 10410282. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1176360.


Spontaneous Perineal Trauma during Non-Operative Childbirth-Retrospective Analysis of Perineal Laceration Risk Factors.

Baczek G, Rzonca E, Sys D, Rychlewicz S, Durka A, Rzonca P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805312 PMC: 9266119. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137653.


Relationship between Perineal Body Length and Degree of Perineal Tears in Primigravidas Undergoing Vaginal Delivery with Episiotomy.

Djusad S, Purwosunu Y, Hidayat F Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021; 2021:2621872.

PMID: 34567127 PMC: 8460378. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2621872.


New approach to the evaluation of perineal measurements to predict the likelihood of the need for an episiotomy.

Moya-Jimenez L, Sanchez-Ferrer M, Adoamnei E, Mendiola J Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 30(5):815-821.

PMID: 30140939 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3745-9.


Pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life changes during first pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Rogers R, Ninivaggio C, Gallagher K, Borders A, Qualls C, Leeman L Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28(11):1701-1707.

PMID: 28417155 PMC: 5673482. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3330-7.


References
1.
Borello-France D, Burgio K, Richter H, Zyczynski H, Fitzgerald M, Whitehead W . Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108(4):863-72. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000232504.32589.3b. View

2.
Albers L, Sedler K, Bedrick E, Teaf D, Peralta P . Midwifery care measures in the second stage of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: a randomized trial. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005; 50(5):365-72. PMC: 1350988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.05.012. View

3.
McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L . A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 105(12):1262-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10004.x. View

4.
Hall A, Theofrastous J, Cundiff G, Harris R, HAMILTON L, Swift S . Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1. View

5.
Sudol-Szopinnska I, Radkiewicz J, Szopinski T, Panorska A, Jakubowski W, Kawka J . Postpartum endoanal ultrasound findings in primiparous women after vaginal delivery. Acta Radiol. 2010; 51(7):819-24. DOI: 10.3109/02841851.2010.491090. View