» Articles » PMID: 15024575

Third Degree Perineal Tears in a University Medical Center Where Midline Episiotomies Are Not Performed

Overview
Date 2004 Mar 17
PMID 15024575
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Midline episiotomy is a known major risk factor for severe perineal lacerations. The study was aimed to define obstetric risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.

Study Design: A comparison between vaginal deliveries complicated with third-degree perineal tears and deliveries without third-degree perineal tears was performed. Deliveries occurred between the years 1988-1999 in a tertiary medical center. Multiple gestations, preterm deliveries (<37 weeks' gestation), cesarean deliveries and cases of shoulder dystocia were excluded from the analysis. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in order to find independent risk factors for third-degree perineal tears. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the regression coefficient.

Results: During the study period, 79 (0.1%) consecutive cases of third degree perineal tears were identified. Significant risk factors from the univariate analysis were fetal macrosomia (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-5.5), nulliparity (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.6), labor induction (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.5), failure of labor to progress during the second stage (OR 10.8, 95% CI 5.4-21.1), non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns (OR 11.7, 95% CI 6.1-21.5), mediolateral episiotomy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8-4.5), vacuum extraction (OR 10.6, 95% CI 6.1-18.3), and forceps delivery (OR 29.2, 95% CI 7.3-97.2). However, using a multivariable analysis, only fetal macrosomia (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-4.9), vacuum extraction (OR 8.2, 95% CI 4.7-14.5), and forceps delivery (OR 26.7, 95% CI 8.0-88.5) remained as independent risk factors. The combined risk for instrumental deliveries of macrosomic newborns was 8.6 (95% CI 1.2-62.5; p=0.010).

Conclusions: After adjustment for possible confounding variables, mediolateral episiotomy per se was not an independent risk factor for third-degree perineal tears. Instrumental vaginal deliveries of macrosomic fetuses should be avoided whenever possible to decrease the occurrence of third-degree perineal tears.

Citing Articles

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Affects the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Fabricius E, Bergholt T, Kelstrup L, Jango H Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(1):25-34.

PMID: 39540971 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05989-9.


Is epidural analgesia an independent risk factor for OASIS? A population-based cohort study.

Eshkoli T, Baumfeld Y, Yohay Z, Binyamin Y, Speigel E, Dym L Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(6):2499-2504.

PMID: 37454350 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07150-1.


The use of metronidazole in women undergoing obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review of the literature.

Rotem R, Mastrolia S, Rottenstreich M, Yohay D, Weintraub A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 302(2):321-328.

PMID: 32564129 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05651-x.


Does birthweight have a role in the effect of episiotomy on anal sphincter injury?.

Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Cahan T, Ilan H, Shai D, Tsur A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(1):171-177.

PMID: 31989293 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05444-2.


Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?.

Zilberman A, Sheiner E, Barrett O, Hamou B, Silberstein T Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 298(1):121-124.

PMID: 29785549 PMC: 5995988. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4783-8.