» Articles » PMID: 24691684

Striking Dichotomy in Outcome of MYCN-amplified Neuroblastoma in the Contemporary Era

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Apr 3
PMID 24691684
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The authors exploited a large database to investigate the outcomes of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma in the contemporary era.

Methods: All patients with high-risk neuroblastoma aged <12 years who were treated during induction at the authors' institution from 2000 through 2011 were studied, including 118 patients with MYCN-amplified [MYCN(+)] disease and 127 patients aged >18 months with MYCN-nonamplified [MYCN(-)] stage 4 disease.

Results: A complete response/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) to induction was correlated with significantly superior event-free survival (EFS) (P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (P < .001) compared with a partial response or less. Patients with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease had similar rates of CR/VGPR to induction (P = .366), and those with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease who attained a CR/VGPR had similar EFS (P = .346) and OS (P = .542). In contrast, only MYCN(+) patients had progressive disease as a response to induction (P < .001), and early death from progressive disease (<366 days after diagnosis) was significantly more common (P < .001) among those with MYCN(+) disease. Overall, among patients who had a partial response or less, MYCN(+) patients had significantly inferior EFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001) compared with MYCN(-) patients, which accounted for the significantly worse EFS (P = .008) and OS (P = .002) for the entire MYCN(+) cohort versus the MYCN(-) cohort.

Conclusions: Patients with MYCN(-), high-risk neuroblastoma display a broad, continuous spectrum with regard to response and outcome, whereas MYCN(+) patients either have an excellent response to induction associated with good long-term outcome or develop early progressive disease with a poor outcome. This extreme dichotomy in the clinical course of MYCN(+) patients points to underlying biologic differences with MYCN(+) neuroblastoma, the elucidation of which may have far-reaching implications, including improved risk classification at diagnosis and the identification of targets for treatment.

Citing Articles

Management of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Soft-Tissue-Only Disease in the Era of Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy.

Gorostegui M, Munoz J, Perez-Jaume S, Simao-Rafael M, Larrosa C, Garraus M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730688 PMC: 11083939. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091735.


Early Salvage Chemo-Immunotherapy with Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Naxitamab Plus GM-CSF (HITS) for Patients with Primary Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma Provide the Best Chance for Long-Term Outcomes.

Munoz J, Larrosa C, Chamorro S, Perez-Jaume S, Simao M, Sanchez-Sierra N Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37835531 PMC: 10571514. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194837.


Naxitamab Combined with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor as Consolidation for High-Risk Neuroblastoma Patients in First Complete Remission under Compassionate Use-Updated Outcome Report.

Mora J, Castaneda A, Gorostegui M, Varo A, Perez-Jaume S, Simao M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37174002 PMC: 10177429. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092535.


Risk factors associated with metastatic site failure in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Lucas Jr J, Wakefield D, Doubrovin M, Li Y, Santiago T, Federico S Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022; 34:42-50.

PMID: 35345864 PMC: 8956847. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.02.009.


MYCN amplification plus 1p36 loss of heterozygosity predicts ultra high risk in bone marrow metastatic neuroblastoma.

Yue Z, Xing T, Zhao W, Zhao Q, Wang X, Su Y Cancer Med. 2022; 11(8):1837-1849.

PMID: 35137546 PMC: 9041068. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4583.


References
1.
Cohn S, Pearson A, London W, Monclair T, Ambros P, Brodeur G . The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 27(2):289-97. PMC: 2650388. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785. View

2.
Lau L, Tai D, Weitzman S, Grant R, Baruchel S, Malkin D . Factors influencing survival in children with recurrent neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004; 26(4):227-32. DOI: 10.1097/00043426-200404000-00003. View

3.
Garaventa A, Parodi S, De Bernardi B, Dau D, Manzitti C, Conte M . Outcome of children with neuroblastoma after progression or relapse. A retrospective study of the Italian neuroblastoma registry. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(16):2835-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.010. View

4.
Kaneko M, Tsuchida Y, Mugishima H, Ohnuma N, Yamamoto K, Kawa K . Intensified chemotherapy increases the survival rates in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma with MYCN amplification. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002; 24(8):613-21. DOI: 10.1097/00043426-200211000-00004. View

5.
Cheung N, Cheung I, Kushner B, Ostrovnaya I, Chamberlain E, Kramer K . Murine anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody 3F8 combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 13-cis-retinoic acid in high-risk patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma in first remission. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(26):3264-70. PMC: 3434986. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.3807. View