Striking Dichotomy in Outcome of MYCN-amplified Neuroblastoma in the Contemporary Era
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The authors exploited a large database to investigate the outcomes of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma in the contemporary era.
Methods: All patients with high-risk neuroblastoma aged <12 years who were treated during induction at the authors' institution from 2000 through 2011 were studied, including 118 patients with MYCN-amplified [MYCN(+)] disease and 127 patients aged >18 months with MYCN-nonamplified [MYCN(-)] stage 4 disease.
Results: A complete response/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) to induction was correlated with significantly superior event-free survival (EFS) (P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (P < .001) compared with a partial response or less. Patients with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease had similar rates of CR/VGPR to induction (P = .366), and those with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease who attained a CR/VGPR had similar EFS (P = .346) and OS (P = .542). In contrast, only MYCN(+) patients had progressive disease as a response to induction (P < .001), and early death from progressive disease (<366 days after diagnosis) was significantly more common (P < .001) among those with MYCN(+) disease. Overall, among patients who had a partial response or less, MYCN(+) patients had significantly inferior EFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001) compared with MYCN(-) patients, which accounted for the significantly worse EFS (P = .008) and OS (P = .002) for the entire MYCN(+) cohort versus the MYCN(-) cohort.
Conclusions: Patients with MYCN(-), high-risk neuroblastoma display a broad, continuous spectrum with regard to response and outcome, whereas MYCN(+) patients either have an excellent response to induction associated with good long-term outcome or develop early progressive disease with a poor outcome. This extreme dichotomy in the clinical course of MYCN(+) patients points to underlying biologic differences with MYCN(+) neuroblastoma, the elucidation of which may have far-reaching implications, including improved risk classification at diagnosis and the identification of targets for treatment.
Gorostegui M, Munoz J, Perez-Jaume S, Simao-Rafael M, Larrosa C, Garraus M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).
PMID: 38730688 PMC: 11083939. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091735.
Munoz J, Larrosa C, Chamorro S, Perez-Jaume S, Simao M, Sanchez-Sierra N Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(19).
PMID: 37835531 PMC: 10571514. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194837.
Mora J, Castaneda A, Gorostegui M, Varo A, Perez-Jaume S, Simao M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).
PMID: 37174002 PMC: 10177429. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092535.
Risk factors associated with metastatic site failure in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Lucas Jr J, Wakefield D, Doubrovin M, Li Y, Santiago T, Federico S Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022; 34:42-50.
PMID: 35345864 PMC: 8956847. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.02.009.
Yue Z, Xing T, Zhao W, Zhao Q, Wang X, Su Y Cancer Med. 2022; 11(8):1837-1849.
PMID: 35137546 PMC: 9041068. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4583.