» Articles » PMID: 27599694

Transcript Signatures That Predict Outcome and Identify Targetable Pathways in MYCN-amplified Neuroblastoma

Overview
Journal Mol Oncol
Date 2016 Sep 8
PMID 27599694
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the pediatric cancer neuroblastoma (NB), patients are stratified into low, intermediate or high-risk subsets based in part on MYCN amplification status. While MYCN amplification in general predicts unfavorable outcome, no clinical or genomic factors have been identified that predict outcome within these cohorts of high-risk patients. In particular, it is currently not possible at diagnosis to determine which high-risk neuroblastoma patients will ultimately fail upfront therapy.

Experimental Design: We analyzed the prognostic potential of most published gene expression signatures for NB and developed a new prognostic signature to predict outcome for patients with MYCN amplification. Network and pathway analyses identified candidate therapeutic targets for this MYCN-amplified patient subset with poor outcome.

Results: Most signatures have a high capacity to predict outcome of unselected NB patients. However, the majority of published signatures, as well as most randomly generated signatures, are highly confounded by MYCN amplification, and fail to predict outcome in subpopulations of high-risk patients with MYCN-amplified NB. We identify a MYCN module signature that predicts patient outcome for those with MYCN-amplified tumors, that also predicts potential tractable therapeutic signaling pathways and targets including the DNA repair enzyme Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP1).

Conclusion: Many prognostic signatures for NB are confounded by MYCN amplification and fail to predict outcome for the subset of high-risk patients with MYCN amplification. We report a MYCN module signature that is associated with distinct patient outcomes, and predicts candidate therapeutic targets in DNA repair pathways, including PARP1 in MYCN-amplified NB.

Citing Articles

A novel role for the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase Cyclophilin A in DNA-repair following replication fork stalling via the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex.

Bedir M, Outwin E, Colnaghi R, Bassett L, Abramowicz I, ODriscoll M EMBO Rep. 2024; 25(8):3432-3455.

PMID: 38943005 PMC: 11315929. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00184-9.


Tissue-Based Diagnostic Biomarkers of Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Kouroukli O, Bravou V, Giannitsas K, Tzelepi V Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398199 PMC: 10887410. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040805.


Development and Validation of a Five-RNA-Based Signature and Identification of Candidate Drugs for Neuroblastoma.

Zhang P, Ma K, Ke X, Liu L, Li Y, Liu Y Front Genet. 2021; 12:685646.

PMID: 34745201 PMC: 8564070. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.685646.


Integrated Genomic, Epigenomic, and Expression Analyses of Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.

Papp E, Hallberg D, Konecny G, Bruhm D, Adleff V, Noe M Cell Rep. 2018; 25(9):2617-2633.

PMID: 30485824 PMC: 6481945. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.096.


MYCN acts as a direct co-regulator of p53 in MYCN amplified neuroblastoma.

Agarwal S, Milazzo G, Rajapakshe K, Bernardi R, Chen Z, Barbieri E Oncotarget. 2018; 9(29):20323-20338.

PMID: 29755654 PMC: 5945521. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24859.


References
1.
Thompson D, Vo K, London W, Fischer M, Ambros P, Nakagawara A . Identification of patient subgroups with markedly disparate rates of MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma: A report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group project. Cancer. 2015; 122(6):935-45. PMC: 4777644. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29848. View

2.
Slavc I, Ellenbogen R, Jung W, VAWTER G, Kretschmar C, Grier H . myc gene amplification and expression in primary human neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 1990; 50(5):1459-63. View

3.
Fardin P, Cornero A, Barla A, Mosci S, Acquaviva M, Rosasco L . Identification of multiple hypoxia signatures in neuroblastoma cell lines by l1-l2 regularization and data reduction. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010; 2010:878709. PMC: 2905945. DOI: 10.1155/2010/878709. View

4.
Tofigh A, Suderman M, Paquet E, Livingstone J, Bertos N, Saleh S . The prognostic ease and difficulty of invasive breast carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2014; 9(1):129-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.073. View

5.
Ladenstein R, Ambros I, Potschger U, Amann G, Urban C, Fink F . Prognostic significance of DNA di-tetraploidy in neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001; 36(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1002/1096-911X(20010101)36:1<83::AID-MPO1020>3.0.CO;2-9. View