» Articles » PMID: 24688753

The Evolution of Clonality Testing in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Hematological Malignancies

Abstract

Currently, distinguishing between benign and malignant lymphoid proliferations is based on a combination of clinical characteristics, cyto/histomorphology, immunophenotype and the identification of well-defined chromosomal aberrations. However, such diagnoses remain challenging in 10-15% of cases of lymphoproliferative disorders, and clonality assessments are often required to confirm diagnostic suspicions. In recent years, the development of new techniques for clonality detection has allowed researchers to better characterize, classify and monitor hematological neoplasms. In the past, clonality was primarily studied by performing Southern blotting analyses to characterize rearrangements in segments of the IG and TCR genes. Currently, the most commonly used method in the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is an extremely sensitive technique for detecting nucleic acids. This technique is rapid, accurate, specific, and sensitive, and it can be used to analyze small biopsies as well as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. These advantages make PCR-based approaches the current gold standard for IG/TCR clonality testing. Since the completion of the first human genome sequence, there has been a rapid development of technologies to facilitate high-throughput sequencing of DNA. These techniques have been applied to the deep characterization and classification of various diseases, patient stratification, and the monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, these novel approaches have the potential to significantly improve the sensitivity and cost of clonality assays and post-treatment monitoring of B- and T-cell malignancies. However, more studies will be required to demonstrate the utility, sensitivity, and benefits of these methods in order to warrant their adoption into clinical practice. In this review, recent developments in clonality testing are examined with an emphasis on highly sensitive systems for improving diagnostic workups and minimal residual disease assessments.

Citing Articles

Conventional PCR-based versus next-generation sequencing-based approach for T-cell receptor γ gene clonality assessment in mature T-cell lymphomas: A phase 3 diagnostic accuracy study.

Donelli R, Gazzola A, Mannu C, Etebari M, Navari M, Piccaluga P J Biol Methods. 2024; 11(2):e99010013.

PMID: 39323485 PMC: 11423944. DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2024.0002.


Deciphering Tumor Cell Evolution in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Distinct Differentiation Trajectories in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.

Jiang T, Cao S, Kruglov O, Virmani A, Geskin L, Falo Jr L J Invest Dermatol. 2023; 144(5):1088-1098.

PMID: 38036289 PMC: 11034798. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.018.


Single-Step IGHV Next-Generation Sequencing Detects Clonality and Somatic Hypermutation in Lymphoid Malignancies: A Phase III Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Gazzola A, Navari M, Mannu C, Donelli R, Etebari M, Piccaluga P Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760593 PMC: 10526376. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184624.


Enhancing diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma using non-recombined T-cell receptor sequences.

Chen Y, Ho C, Hung C, Chen W, Chang C, Hou Y Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1014132.

PMID: 36568146 PMC: 9772823. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1014132.


Experience with the BIOMED-2 standardized polymerase chain reaction protocol for immunoglobulin and T- cell receptor clonality analysis in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia.

Villamizar-Rivera N, Olaya N Biomedica. 2022; 42(Sp. 1):64-78.

PMID: 35866731 PMC: 9385446. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5940.


References
1.
Tumkaya T, Comans-Bitter W, Verhoeven M, van Dongen J . Southern blot detection of immunoglobulin lambda light chain gene rearrangements for clonality studies. Leukemia. 1995; 9(12):2127-32. View

2.
Evans P, Pott C, Groenen P, Salles G, Davi F, Berger F . Significantly improved PCR-based clonality testing in B-cell malignancies by use of multiple immunoglobulin gene targets. Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936. Leukemia. 2006; 21(2):207-14. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404479. View

3.
Rezuke W, Abernathy E, Tsongalis G . Molecular diagnosis of B- and T-cell lymphomas: fundamental principles and clinical applications. Clin Chem. 1997; 43(10):1814-23. View

4.
McClure R, Kaur P, Pagel E, Ouillette P, Holtegaard C, Treptow C . Validation of immunoglobulin gene rearrangement detection by PCR using commercially available BIOMED-2 primers. Leukemia. 2005; 20(1):176-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404049. View

5.
Bruggemann M, Schrauder A, Raff T, Pfeifer H, Dworzak M, Ottmann O . Standardized MRD quantification in European ALL trials: proceedings of the Second International Symposium on MRD assessment in Kiel, Germany, 18-20 September 2008. Leukemia. 2009; 24(3):521-35. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.268. View