» Articles » PMID: 24686930

Quantitative Genetic Versions of Hamilton's Rule with Empirical Applications

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Apr 2
PMID 24686930
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hamilton's theory of inclusive fitness revolutionized our understanding of the evolution of social interactions. Surprisingly, an incorporation of Hamilton's perspective into the quantitative genetic theory of phenotypic evolution has been slow, despite the popularity of quantitative genetics in evolutionary studies. Here, we discuss several versions of Hamilton's rule for social evolution from a quantitative genetic perspective, emphasizing its utility in empirical applications. Although evolutionary quantitative genetics offers methods to measure each of the critical parameters of Hamilton's rule, empirical work has lagged behind theory. In particular, we lack studies of selection on altruistic traits in the wild. Fitness costs and benefits of altruism can be estimated using a simple extension of phenotypic selection analysis that incorporates the traits of social interactants. We also discuss the importance of considering the genetic influence of the social environment, or indirect genetic effects (IGEs), in the context of Hamilton's rule. Research in social evolution has generated an extensive body of empirical work focusing--with good reason--almost solely on relatedness. We argue that quantifying the roles of social and non-social components of selection and IGEs, in addition to relatedness, is now timely and should provide unique additional insights into social evolution.

Citing Articles

A scaling law of multilevel evolution: how the balance between within- and among-collective evolution is determined.

Takeuchi N, Mitarai N, Kaneko K Genetics. 2021; 220(2).

PMID: 34849893 PMC: 9208640. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab182.


Social animal models for quantifying plasticity, assortment, and selection on interacting phenotypes.

Martin J, Jaeggi A J Evol Biol. 2021; 35(4):520-538.

PMID: 34233047 PMC: 9292565. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13900.


Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour in .

Jaffe A, Burns M, Saltz J Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1928):20200057.

PMID: 32517624 PMC: 7341925. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0057.


Farming plant cooperation in crops.

Montazeaud G, Rousset F, Fort F, Violle C, Freville H, Gandon S Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1919):20191290.

PMID: 31964305 PMC: 7015324. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1290.


Green beards in the light of indirect genetic effects.

Trubenova B, Hager R Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(17):9597-9608.

PMID: 31534678 PMC: 6745669. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5484.


References
1.
Clutton-Brock T . Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature. 2009; 462(7269):51-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature08366. View

2.
Sherman P . Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science. 1977; 197(4310):1246-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.197.4310.1246. View

3.
Leigh Jr E . The group selection controversy. J Evol Biol. 2009; 23(1):6-19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01876.x. View

4.
West S, Griffin A, Gardner A . Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J Evol Biol. 2007; 20(2):415-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x. View

5.
McGlothlin J, Brodie Iii E . How to measure indirect genetic effects: the congruence of trait-based and variance-partitioning approaches. Evolution. 2009; 63(7):1785-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00676.x. View