» Articles » PMID: 21967420

Phenotypic Assortment Mediates the Effect of Social Selection in a Wild Beetle Population

Overview
Journal Evolution
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Oct 5
PMID 21967420
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social interactions often have major fitness consequences, but little is known about how specific interacting phenotypes affect the strength of natural selection. Social influences on the evolutionary process can be assessed using a multilevel selection approach that partitions the effects of social partner phenotypes on fitness (referred to as social or group selection) from those of the traits of a focal individual (nonsocial or individual selection). To quantify the contribution of social selection to total selection affecting a trait, the patterns of phenotypic association among interactants must also be considered. We estimated selection gradients on male body size in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus). We detected positive nonsocial selection and negative social selection on body size operating through differences in copulation success, indicating that large males with small social partners had highest fitness. In addition, we found that, in low-density demes, the phenotypes of focal individuals were negatively correlated with those of their social partners. This pattern reversed the negative effect of group selection on body size and led to stronger positive selection for body size. Our results demonstrate multilevel selection in nature and stress the importance of considering social selection whenever conspecific interactions occur nonrandomly.

Citing Articles

Population age structure shapes selection on social behaviour in a long-lived insect.

Cook P, Costello R, Brodie Iii E, Formica V Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1916):20230331.

PMID: 39463252 PMC: 11513641. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0331.


Evolutionary rescue from climate change: male indirect genetic effects on lay-dates and their consequences for population persistence.

Murray M, Wright J, Araya-Ajoy Y Evol Lett. 2024; 8(1):137-148.

PMID: 38487362 PMC: 10939382. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrad022.


The impact of small groups on pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous populations.

McDonald G Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(5):e10057.

PMID: 37153025 PMC: 10154804. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10057.


Maternal effects do not resolve the paradox of stasis in birth weight in a wild red deer populaton.

Gauzere J, Pemberton J, Kruuk L, Morris A, Morris S, Walling C Evolution. 2022; 76(11):2605-2617.

PMID: 36111977 PMC: 9828841. DOI: 10.1111/evo.14622.


Group and individual social network metrics are robust to changes in resource distribution in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles.

Costello R, Cook P, Formica V, Brodie 3rd E J Anim Ecol. 2022; 91(4):895-907.

PMID: 35220593 PMC: 9313900. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13684.