» Articles » PMID: 24663049

Prolonged Administration of Azacitidine with or Without Entinostat for Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-related Changes: Results of the US Leukemia Intergroup Trial E1905

Abstract

Purpose: Although azacitidine (AZA) improves survival in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, the overall response remains approximately 50%. Entinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has been combined with AZA with significant clinical activity in a previous phase I dose finding study.

Design: Open label phase II randomized trial comparing AZA 50 mg/m(2)/d given for 10 days ± entinostat 4 mg/m(2)/d day 3 and day 10. All subtypes of myelodysplasia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes were eligible for the study. The primary objective was the rate of hematologic normalization (HN; complete remission + partial remission + trilineage hematological improvement).

Results: One hundred forty-nine patients were analyzed, including 97 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and 52 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the AZA group, 32% (95% CI, 22% to 44%) experienced HN and 27% (95% CI, 17% to 39%) in the AZA + entinostat group. Both arms exceeded the HN rate of historical control (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9221 trial), but only the AZA group fulfilled the primary objective of the study. Rates of overall hematologic response were 46% and 44%, respectively. Median overall survivals were 18 months for the AZA group and 13 months for the AZA + entinostat group. The combination arm led to less demethylation compared with the monotherapy arm, suggesting pharmacodynamic antagonism.

Conclusion: Addition of entinostat to AZA did not increase clinical response as defined by the protocol and was associated with pharmacodynamic antagonism. However, the prolonged administration of AZA by itself seems to increase HN rate compared with standard dosing and warrants additional investigation.

Citing Articles

A CRISPR-Cas9 screen reveals genetic determinants of the cellular response to decitabine.

Zhang P, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Du W, Song X, Lai W EMBO Rep. 2025; .

PMID: 39930152 DOI: 10.1038/s44319-025-00385-w.


Selinexor in combination with venetoclax and decitabine in patients with refractory myelodysplastic syndrome previously exposed to hypomethylating agents: three case reports.

Xiao Y, Yang K, Huang Q, Wei C, Wei M, Geng Z Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1477697.

PMID: 39749030 PMC: 11693730. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1477697.


Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.

Dai W, Qiao X, Fang Y, Guo R, Bai P, Liu S Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):332.

PMID: 39592582 PMC: 11627502. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02039-0.


Midostaurin added to 10-day decitabine, for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy with AML and higher risk MDS, irrespective of FLT3 mutational status, does not improve outcome.

Huls G, Chitu D, Tick L, Boersma R, Breems D, Herbers A Ann Hematol. 2024; 104(1):361-368.

PMID: 39367118 PMC: 11868317. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-06033-y.


Inhibition of TOPORS ubiquitin ligase augments the efficacy of DNA hypomethylating agents through DNMT1 stabilization.

Kaito S, Aoyama K, Oshima M, Tsuchiya A, Miyota M, Yamashita M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7359.

PMID: 39198387 PMC: 11358161. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50498-4.


References
1.
Fenaux P, Mufti G, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A . Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(3):223-32. PMC: 4086808. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8. View

2.
Silverman L, Demakos E, Peterson B, Kornblith A, Holland J, Odchimar-Reissig R . Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(10):2429-40. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.117. View

3.
Gore S, Hermes-DeSantis E . Future directions in myelodysplastic syndrome: newer agents and the role of combination approaches. Cancer Control. 2008; 15 Suppl:40-9. PMC: 2727156. DOI: 10.1177/107327480801504s05. View

4.
Figueroa M, Skrabanek L, Li Y, Jiemjit A, Fandy T, Paietta E . MDS and secondary AML display unique patterns and abundance of aberrant DNA methylation. Blood. 2009; 114(16):3448-58. PMC: 2765680. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-200519. View

5.
Gore S, Baylin S, Sugar E, Carraway H, Miller C, Carducci M . Combined DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in the treatment of myeloid neoplasms. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(12):6361-9. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0080. View