» Articles » PMID: 34944006

Gene Expression Profiles Identify Biomarkers of Resistance to Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34944006
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by inefficient hematopoiesis and the potential development of acute leukemia. Among the most notable advances in the treatment of MDS is the hypomethylating agent, decitabine (5-aza-2'deoxycytidine). Although decitabine is well known as an effective method for treating MDS patients, only a subset of patients respond and a tolerance often develops, leading to treatment failure. Moreover, decitabine treatment is costly and causes unnecessary toxicity. Therefore, clarifying the mechanism of decitabine resistance is important for improving its therapeutic efficacy. To this end, we established a decitabine-resistant F-36P cell line from the parental F-36P leukemia cell line, and applied a genetic approach employing next-generation sequencing, various experimental techniques, and bioinformatics tools to determine differences in gene expression and relationships among genes. Thirty-eight candidate genes encoding proteins involved in decitabine-resistant-related pathways, including immune checkpoints, the regulation of myeloid cell differentiation, and PI3K-Akt signaling, were identified. Interestingly, two of the candidate genes, AKT3 and FOS, were overexpressed in MDS patients with poor prognoses. On the basis of these results, we are pursuing development of a gene chip for diagnosing decitabine resistance in MDS patients, with the goal of ultimately improving the power to predict treatment strategies and the prognosis of MDS patients.

Citing Articles

Abnormal regulation of miR-29b-ID1 signaling is involved in the process of decitabine resistance in leukemia cells.

Ma J, Wen X, Xu Z, Xia P, Jin Y, Lin J Cell Cycle. 2023; 22(10):1215-1231.

PMID: 37032592 PMC: 10193880. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2200312.


The contributing factors of resistance or sensitivity to epigenetic drugs in the treatment of AML.

Kelaye S, Najafi F, Kazemi B, Foruzandeh Z, Seif F, Solali S Clin Transl Oncol. 2022; 24(7):1250-1261.

PMID: 35076883 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02776-0.

References
1.
Le Y . Screening and identification of key candidate genes and pathways in myelodysplastic syndrome by bioinformatic analysis. PeerJ. 2019; 7:e8162. PMC: 6886488. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8162. View

2.
Stomper J, Lubbert M . Can we predict responsiveness to hypomethylating agents in AML?. Semin Hematol. 2019; 56(2):118-124. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2019.02.001. View

3.
Lee J, Choi Y, Kim S, Kim D, Lee J, Lee K . Clinical outcome after failure of hypomethylating therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2014; 94(6):546-53. DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12469. View

4.
Alva A, Hahn N, Aparicio A, Singal R, Yellapragada S, Sonpavde G . Hypomethylating agents for urologic cancers. Future Oncol. 2011; 7(3):447-63. DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.9. View

5.
Scalzulli E, Pepe S, Colafigli G, Breccia M . Therapeutic strategies in low and high-risk MDS: What does the future have to offer?. Blood Rev. 2020; 45:100689. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100689. View