» Articles » PMID: 24661054

The Role of Object Categories in Hybrid Visual and Memory Search

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2014 Mar 26
PMID 24661054
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In hybrid search, observers search for any of several possible targets in a visual display containing distracting items and, perhaps, a target. Wolfe (2012) found that response times (RTs) in such tasks increased linearly with increases in the number of items in the display. However, RT increased linearly with the log of the number of items in the memory set. In earlier work, all items in the memory set were unique instances (e.g., this apple in this pose). Typical real-world tasks involve more broadly defined sets of stimuli (e.g., any "apple" or, perhaps, "fruit"). The present experiments show how sets or categories of targets are handled in joint visual and memory search. In Experiment 1, searching for a digit among letters was not like searching for targets from a 10-item memory set, though searching for targets from an N-item memory set of arbitrary alphanumeric characters was like searching for targets from an N-item memory set of arbitrary objects. In Experiment 2, observers searched for any instance of N sets or categories held in memory. This hybrid search was harder than search for specific objects. However, memory search remained logarithmic. Experiment 3 illustrates the interaction of visual guidance and memory search when a subset of visual stimuli are drawn from a target category. Furthermore, we outline a conceptual model, supported by our results, defining the core components that would be necessary to support such categorical hybrid searches.

Citing Articles

Investigating the effects of context, visual working memory, and inhibitory control in hybrid visual search.

Barbosa A, Ruarte G, Ries A, Kamienkowski J, Ison M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1436564.

PMID: 39257697 PMC: 11384996. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436564.


Multiple visual items can be simultaneously compared with target templates in memory.

Zheng Y, Lou J, Lu Y, Li Z Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(5):1641-1652.

PMID: 38839716 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02906-6.


Attenuation of spatial bias with target template variation.

Hong I, Kim M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7869.

PMID: 38570555 PMC: 10991434. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57255-z.


Activated long-term memory and visual working memory during hybrid visual search: Effects on target memory search and distractor memory.

Saltzmann S, Eich B, Moen K, Beck M Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):2156-2171.

PMID: 38528298 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01556-1.


Category-based attention facilitates memory search.

Shang L, Yeh L, Zhao Y, Wiegand I, Peelen M eNeuro. 2024; .

PMID: 38331577 PMC: 10897531. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0012-24.2024.


References
1.
Standing L . Learning 10,000 pictures. Q J Exp Psychol. 1973; 25(2):207-22. DOI: 10.1080/14640747308400340. View

2.
Nosofsky R, Palmeri T . An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(2):266-300. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.266. View

3.
Duncan J . Category effects in visual search: a failure to replicate the "oh-zero" phenomenon. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 34(3):221-32. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202949. View

4.
Walker S, Stafford P, Davis G . Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. J Vis. 2008; 8(4):21.1-12. DOI: 10.1167/8.4.21. View

5.
Wolfe J, Horowitz T, Kenner N, Hyle M, Vasan N . How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Res. 2004; 44(12):1411-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024. View