» Articles » PMID: 14986138

Visual-memory Search: an Integrative Perspective

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2004 Feb 27
PMID 14986138
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A large, single-frame, visual-memory search experiment is reported in which memory and display loads of 1, 2, and 4 alphanumeric characters were factorially combined. In addition to the usual Consistent Mapping and Varied Mapping conditions, the experiment also involved a Categorical Varied Mapping condition in which different sets of stimuli switched roles as targets and distractors over trials. The stimuli used in these various mapping conditions were either digits, letters, or digits and letters. Analyses of the response time means obtained early and late in training suggest that the presence of categorical distinctions among the stimuli is the most important determinant of search efficiency. Comparison of the load effects on the response time means and on their standard deviations revealed a fairly constant ratio throughout the experimental conditions, which suggests that similar search processes may have been involved. A feature-based comparison model is indeed shown to account for the response time means obtained after extensive training under just about all training conditions, as well as for the ratios of load effects on means and standard deviations. According to the model, improvement in search efficiency results from a reduction in the number of features considered. The model's performance questions the necessity to postulate qualitative differences between controlled and automatic processing, while the experiment forces a reassessment of the importance of the consistent mapping that underlies dual-process theories.

Citing Articles

Effects of repeated testing in a pen-and-paper test of selective attention (FAIR-2).

Wuhr B, Wuhr P Psychol Res. 2021; 86(1):294-311.

PMID: 33570657 PMC: 8821485. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01481-x.


Transferring control demands across incidental learning tasks - stronger sequence usage in serial reaction task after shortcut option in letter string checking.

Gaschler R, Marewski J, Wenke D, Frensch P Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1388.

PMID: 25506336 PMC: 4246662. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01388.


The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.

Cunningham C, Wolfe J J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014; 143(4):1585-99.

PMID: 24661054 PMC: 4115034. DOI: 10.1037/a0036313.


fMRI guided rTMS evidence for reduced left prefrontal involvement after task practice.

Jansma J, van Raalten T, Boessen R, Neggers S, Jacobs R, Kahn R PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e80256.

PMID: 24376494 PMC: 3869649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080256.


Merging race models and adaptive networks: a parallel race network.

Cousineau D Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 11(5):807-25.

PMID: 15732689 DOI: 10.3758/bf03196707.

References
1.
Kramer A, Strayer D, Buckley J . Development and transfer of automatic processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990; 16(3):505-22. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.505. View

2.
Zenger B, Fahle M . Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998; 23(6):1783-91. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.6.1783. View

3.
Compton B, Logan G . The transition from algorithm to retrieval in memory-based theories of automaticity. Mem Cognit. 1991; 19(2):151-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197111. View

4.
Ward , Duncan , Shapiro . The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(1):79-109. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0003. View

5.
Chun M, Wolfe J . Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(1):39-78. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002. View