» Articles » PMID: 24622199

Interrogating Selectivity in Catalysis Using Molecular Vibrations

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Mar 14
PMID 24622199
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The delineation of molecular properties that underlie reactivity and selectivity is at the core of physical organic chemistry, and this knowledge can be used to inform the design of improved synthetic methods or identify new chemical transformations. For this reason, the mathematical representation of properties affecting reactivity and selectivity trends, that is, molecular parameters, is paramount. Correlations produced by equating these molecular parameters with experimental outcomes are often defined as free-energy relationships and can be used to evaluate the origin of selectivity and to generate new, experimentally testable hypotheses. The premise behind successful correlations of this type is that a systematically perturbed molecular property affects a transition-state interaction between the catalyst, substrate and any reaction components involved in the determination of selectivity. Classic physical organic molecular descriptors, such as Hammett, Taft or Charton parameters, seek to independently probe isolated electronic or steric effects. However, these parameters cannot address simultaneous, non-additive variations to more than one molecular property, which limits their utility. Here we report a parameter system based on the vibrational response of a molecule to infrared radiation that can be used to mathematically model and predict selectivity trends for reactions with interlinked steric and electronic effects at positions of interest. The disclosed parameter system is mechanistically derived and should find broad use in the study of chemical and biological systems.

Citing Articles

Computational tools for the prediction of site- and regioselectivity of organic reactions.

Sigmund L, Assante M, Johansson M, Norrby P, Jorner K, Kabeshov M Chem Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40070469 PMC: 11891785. DOI: 10.1039/d5sc00541h.


Connecting the complexity of stereoselective synthesis to the evolution of predictive tools.

Li J, Reid J Chem Sci. 2025; 16(9):3832-3851.

PMID: 39911341 PMC: 11791519. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc07461k.


Systematic Parameter Determination Aimed at a Catalyst-Controlled Asymmetric Rh(I)-Catalyzed Pauson-Khand Reaction.

Qi Y, Jesikiewicz L, Scofield G, Liu P, Brummond K ACS Catal. 2024; 14(22):17065-17076.

PMID: 39569153 PMC: 11574763. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.4c04490.


Catalysing (organo-)catalysis: Trends in the application of machine learning to enantioselective organocatalysis.

Schmid S, Schlosser L, Glorius F, Jorner K Beilstein J Org Chem. 2024; 20:2280-2304.

PMID: 39290209 PMC: 11406055. DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.20.196.


A genetic optimization strategy with generality in asymmetric organocatalysis as a primary target.

Gallarati S, van Gerwen P, Laplaza R, Brey L, Makaveev A, Corminboeuf C Chem Sci. 2024; 15(10):3640-3660.

PMID: 38455002 PMC: 10915838. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc06208b.


References
1.
Bess E, Sigman M . Distinctive meta-directing group effect for iridium-catalyzed 1,1-diarylalkene enantioselective hydrogenation. Org Lett. 2013; 15(3):646-9. DOI: 10.1021/ol303465c. View

2.
Shahlaei M . Descriptor selection methods in quantitative structure-activity relationship studies: a review study. Chem Rev. 2013; 113(10):8093-103. DOI: 10.1021/cr3004339. View

3.
Dunitz J, Ibberson R . Is deuterium always smaller than protium?. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008; 47(22):4208-10. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200800063. View

4.
Sigman M, Miller J . Examination of the role of Taft-type steric parameters in asymmetric catalysis. J Org Chem. 2009; 74(20):7633-43. DOI: 10.1021/jo901698t. View

5.
Harper K, Sigman M . Three-dimensional correlation of steric and electronic free energy relationships guides asymmetric propargylation. Science. 2011; 333(6051):1875-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1206997. View