» Articles » PMID: 24614108

Transport Properties of Pancreatic Cancer Describe Gemcitabine Delivery and Response

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is partly ascribed to ineffective delivery of chemotherapy to cancer cells. We hypothesized that physical properties at vascular, extracellular, and cellular scales influence delivery of and response to gemcitabine-based therapy.

Methods: We developed a method to measure mass transport properties during routine contrast-enhanced CT scans of individual human PDAC tumors. Additionally, we evaluated gemcitabine infusion during PDAC resection in 12 patients, measuring gemcitabine incorporation into tumor DNA and correlating its uptake with human equilibrative nucleoside transporter (hENT1) levels, stromal reaction, and CT-derived mass transport properties. We also studied associations between CT-derived transport properties and clinical outcomes in patients who received preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for resectable PDAC.

Results: Transport modeling of 176 CT scans illustrated striking differences in transport properties between normal pancreas and tumor, with a wide array of enhancement profiles. Reflecting the interpatient differences in contrast enhancement, resected tumors exhibited dramatic differences in gemcitabine DNA incorporation, despite similar intravascular pharmacokinetics. Gemcitabine incorporation into tumor DNA was inversely related to CT-derived transport parameters and PDAC stromal score, after accounting for hENT1 levels. Moreover, stromal score directly correlated with CT-derived parameters. Among 110 patients who received preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy, CT-derived parameters correlated with pathological response and survival.

Conclusion: Gemcitabine incorporation into tumor DNA is highly variable and correlates with multiscale transport properties that can be derived from routine CT scans. Furthermore, pretherapy CT-derived properties correlate with clinically relevant endpoints.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01276613.

Funding: Lustgarten Foundation (989161), Department of Defense (W81XWH-09-1-0212), NIH (U54CA151668, KCA088084).

Citing Articles

A comprehensive review of 3D cancer models for drug screening and translational research.

Sharma K, Dey S, Karmakar R, Rengan A Cancer Innov. 2024; 3(1):e102.

PMID: 38948533 PMC: 11212324. DOI: 10.1002/cai2.102.


PanIN or IPMN? Redefining Lesion Size in 3 Dimensions.

Kiemen A, Dequiedt L, Shen Y, Zhu Y, Matos-Romero V, Forjaz A Am J Surg Pathol. 2024; 48(7):839-845.

PMID: 38764379 PMC: 11189722. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002245.


Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: The Conjoined Twins.

Zmaili M, Alzubi J, Alkhayyat M, Albakri A, Alkhalaileh F, Longinow J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672532 PMC: 11048405. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081450.


Deletion of the mRNA stability factor (HuR) in pancreatic cancer cells disrupts the tumor microenvironment integrity.

McCarthy G, Di Niro R, Finan J, Jain A, Guo Y, Wyatt C NAR Cancer. 2023; 5(2):zcad016.

PMID: 37089813 PMC: 10113877. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad016.


Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Premonitions, Timely Precursor Detection and Increased Curative-Intent Surgery.

Soreide K, Ismail W, Roalso M, Ghotbi J, Zaharia C Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231154711.

PMID: 36916724 PMC: 9893084. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231154711.


References
1.
Farrell J, Elsaleh H, Garcia M, Lai R, Ammar A, Regine W . Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 levels predict response to gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2008; 136(1):187-95. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.067. View

2.
Kindler H, Ioka T, Richel D, Bennouna J, Letourneau R, Okusaka T . Axitinib plus gemcitabine versus placebo plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a double-blind randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(3):256-62. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70004-3. View

3.
Frieboes H, Chaplain M, Thompson A, Bearer E, Lowengrub J, Cristini V . Physical oncology: a bench-to-bedside quantitative and predictive approach. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(2):298-302. PMC: 3073485. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2676. View

4.
Nagaraju G, El-Rayes B . SPARC and DNA methylation: possible diagnostic and therapeutic implications in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Lett. 2012; 328(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.08.028. View

5.
Edgerton M, Chuang Y, Macklin P, Yang W, Bearer E, Cristini V . A novel, patient-specific mathematical pathology approach for assessment of surgical volume: application to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2011; 34(5):247-63. PMC: 3613121. DOI: 10.3233/ACP-2011-0019. View