» Articles » PMID: 24600414

Hand Preference, Performance Abilities, and Hand Selection in Children

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2014 Mar 7
PMID 24600414
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is widely know that the pattern of human handedness is such that approximately 90% of the population is right handed with the remainder being left handed, at least in the adult population. What is less well understood is how handedness develops and at what age adult-like handedness patterns emerge. Quantified in terms of both preference and performance, a plethora of different behavioral assessments are currently in use with both children and adults. Handedness questionnaires are commonly used; however, these possess inherent limitations, considering their subjective nature. Hand performance measures have also been implemented; however, such tasks appear to measure different components of handedness. In addition to these traditional measures, handedness has been successfully assessed through observation of hand selection in reaching, which has proven to be a unique and effective manner in understanding the development of handedness in children. Research over the past several decades has demonstrated that young children display weak, inconsistent hand preference tendencies and are slower with both hands. Performance differences between the hands are larger for young children, and consistency improves with age. However, there remains some controversy surrounding the age at which hand preference and hand performance abilities can be considered fully developed. The following paper will provide a review of the literature pertaining to hand preference, performance abilities and hand selection in children in an attempt to ascertain the age at which adult-like patterns of hand preference and performance emerge.

Citing Articles

A comprehensive scoping review and meta-analysis of upper limb strength asymmetry.

Foley R, Callaghan D, Forman G, Graham J, Holmes M, La Delfa N Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4636.

PMID: 39920213 PMC: 11806048. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87413-w.


Retrospective MRI analysis of 418 adult shoulder joints to assess the physiological morphology of the glenoid in a low-grade osteoarthritic population.

Meier M, Brandt L, Seitz M, Roch P, Jackle K, Seif Amir Hosseini A BMC Med Imaging. 2025; 25(1):35.

PMID: 39891049 PMC: 11786470. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-025-01568-6.


Might culture impact the assessment of handedness in Black participants in neuroscience research?.

Nwufo M, Onuoha A, Mallory C, Stradford J, Zaidel E, Mays V Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1390881.

PMID: 39583216 PMC: 11583062. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1390881.


Quantifying Hand Motion Complexity in Simulated Sailing Using Inertial Sensors.

Sarai G, Jayaraman P, Wickramasinghe N, Tirosh O Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(20).

PMID: 39460209 PMC: 11511208. DOI: 10.3390/s24206728.


Prevalence and plasma exosome-derive microRNA diagnostic biomarker screening of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Yunnan Province, China.

Yuan P, Wang Z, Jiang H, Wang Y, Yang J, Li L Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1308931.

PMID: 38720947 PMC: 11076730. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1308931.


References
1.
Rymar K, Kameyama T, Niwa S, Hiramatsu K, Saitoh O . Hand and eye preference patterns in elementary and junior high school students. Cortex. 1984; 20(3):441-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(84)80013-1. View

2.
OLeary D . A developmental study of interhemispheric transfer in children aged five to ten. Child Dev. 1980; 51(3):743-50. View

3.
Steenhuis R . The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure. Laterality. 2004; 4(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1080/713754324. View

4.
Cavill S, Bryden P . Development of handedness: comparison of questionnaire and performance-based measures of preference. Brain Cogn. 2003; 53(2):149-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00098-8. View

5.
Gesell A, Ames L . The development of handedness. J Genet Psychol. 2010; 70(2):155-75. DOI: 10.1080/08856559.1947.10533403. View