» Articles » PMID: 24589403

Standardization and Optimization of CT Protocols to Achieve Low Dose

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Mar 5
PMID 24589403
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The increase in radiation exposure due to CT scans has been of growing concern in recent years. CT scanners differ in their capabilities, and various indications require unique protocols, but there remains room for standardization and optimization. In this paper, the authors summarize approaches to reduce dose, as discussed in lectures constituting the first session of the 2013 UCSF Virtual Symposium on Radiation Safety and Computed Tomography. The experience of scanning at low dose in different body regions, for both diagnostic and interventional CT procedures, is addressed. An essential primary step is justifying the medical need for each scan. General guiding principles for reducing dose include tailoring a scan to a patient, minimizing scan length, use of tube current modulation and minimizing tube current, minimizing tube potential, iterative reconstruction, and periodic review of CT studies. Organized efforts for standardization have been spearheaded by professional societies such as the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Finally, all team members should demonstrate an awareness of the importance of minimizing dose.

Citing Articles

Impact of reconstruction techniques on low dose chest CT image quality: comparison of FBP, Clear View at Mzuzu Central Hospital, Malawi.

Zhang H, Kondowe B, Zhang J, Xie X, Song Q, Niu G Malawi Med J. 2025; 36(5):328-332.

PMID: 40018020 PMC: 11862843. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v36i5.7.


Comparison of the CT-based micromotion analysis method versus marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head translation and evaluation of its intra- and interobserver reliability: a prospective agreement diagnostic study on 27 patients up to 1 year.

Angelomenos V, Shareghi B, Itayem R, Mohaddes M Acta Orthop. 2025; 96():38-44.

PMID: 39786207 PMC: 11734532. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42705.


Investigating knowledge of DRLs, image quality and radiation dose in PET/CT and CT imaging among medical imaging professionals.

Alhorani Q, Al-Ibraheem A, Rawashdeh M, Alkhybari E, Sabarudin A, A Latiff R Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30030.

PMID: 38707442 PMC: 11066384. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30030.


Protocol parameter extraction and centralization framework for comprehensive and in-depth CT protocol review and management.

LaBella A, Zhang D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(4):e14316.

PMID: 38462952 PMC: 11005989. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14316.


Automatization of CT Annotation: Combining AI Efficiency with Expert Precision.

Edelmers E, Kazoka D, Bolocko K, Sudars K, Pilmane M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38248062 PMC: 10814874. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020185.


References
1.
Goldberg-Stein S, Liu B, Hahn P, Lee S . Body CT during pregnancy: utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 196(1):146-51. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4271. View

2.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

3.
Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Hamberg L, Blake M, Shepard J . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004; 230(3):619-28. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021726. View

4.
Li J, Udayasankar U, Toth T, Seamans J, Small W, Kalra M . Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(2):547-52. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0370. View

5.
Hendel R, Patel M, Allen J, Min J, Shaw L, Wolk M . Appropriate use of cardiovascular technology: 2013 ACCF appropriate use criteria methodology update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(12):1305-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.025. View