An 11-item Measure to Assess Borderline Traits in Adolescents: Refinement of the BPFSC Using IRT

Overview

Journal Personal Disord

Specialty Psychology

Date 2014 Mar 5

PMID 24588063

Citations 35

Authors

Carla Sharp

Lynne Steinberg

Jeff Temple

Elizabeth Newlin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Despite historical concerns about the validity of the construct of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescence, there is now general consensus that BPD in adolescence constitutes a valid and reliable diagnosis. Yet the development and refinement of measures to assess borderline traits in adolescents is in its infancy. Moreover, brief and easy-to-administer measures of borderline traits for use in large-scale studies do not exist. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFSC; Crick, Murray-Close, & Woods, 2005) and develop a short version of the BPFSC through the use of item response theory (IRT) methods. BPFSC data from a community sample of 964 adolescents (mean age = 15.1 years, SD = .79; 55.9% female) were used to examine the factor structure of the BPFSC. The hypothesized 4-factor structure was not supported. The unidimensional IRT analysis showed instances of local dependence among item pairs and item responses that were not strongly related to the underlying construct. As a consequence, items were eliminated, creating a unidimensional 11-item brief BPFSC (the BPFSC-11). Next, evidence of construct validity of scores based on the shortened version was evaluated using a different sample of 371 inpatient adolescents. We demonstrated similar indices of construct validity as observed for the BPFSC total score with the BPFSC-11 scores and found evidence for good criterion validity. Use of the BPFSC-11 in clinical settings will reduce the burden on respondents without loss of information.

Citing Articles

Borderline personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescents: protocol for a comparative study of borderline personality disorder with and without comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (BORDERSTRESS-ADO).

Riou M, Duclos H, Leribillard M, Parienti J, Segobin S, Viard A BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):724.

PMID: 39443885 PMC: 11515767. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06093-4.

Clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children to differentiate among adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology: a replication study.

Gecha T, McLaren V, Sharp C Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024; 11(1):21.

PMID: 39183330 PMC: 11346013. DOI: 10.1186/s40479-024-00264-1.

Unpacking the p-factor. Associations Between Maladaptive Personality Traits and General Psychopathology in Female and Male Adolescents.

Benzi I, Fontana A, Di Pierro R, Parolin L, Ensink K Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023; 52(3):473-486.

PMID: 37938410 PMC: 10896943. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-023-01146-w.

Mental Health Information Reporting Assistant (MHIRA)-an open-source software facilitating evidence-based assessment for clinical services.

Zimmermann R, Konjufca J, Sakejo P, Kilonzo M, Quevedo Y, Blum K BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):706.

PMID: 37784115 PMC: 10544613. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05201-0.

Finding Voices: a survey of young people's experiences of the ED.

Keating L, Wilson S, Dainty J, Jones D, Hill J Emerg Med J. 2023; 40(10):708-714.

PMID: 37586788 PMC: 10579507. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213299.

References

Miller A, Muehlenkamp J, Jacobson C . Fact or fiction: diagnosing borderline personality disorder in adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28(6):969-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.004. View

Sharp C, Mosko O, Chang B, Ha C . The cross-informant concordance and concurrent validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in a community sample of boys. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010; 16(3):335-49. DOI: 10.1177/1359104510366279. View

Noblin J, Venta A, Sharp C . The validity of the MSI-BPD among inpatient adolescents. Assessment. 2013; 21(2):210-7. DOI: 10.1177/1073191112473177. View

Sharp C, Romero C . Borderline personality disorder: a comparison between children and adults. Bull Menninger Clin. 2007; 71(2):85-114. DOI: 10.1521/bumc.2007.71.2.85. View

Chanen A . Review: urgent need for RCT evidence on effectiveness of crisis interventions for borderline personality disorder. Evid Based Ment Health. 2012; 15(4):94. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2012-100928. View

Sharp C, Ha C, Michonski J, Venta A, Carbone C . Borderline personality disorder in adolescents: evidence in support of the Childhood Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder in a sample of adolescent inpatients. Compr Psychiatry. 2012; 53(6):765-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.12.003. View

Sanislow C, Grilo C, Morey L, Bender D, Skodol A, Gunderson J . Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(2):284-90. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.284. View

Zanarini M, Frankenburg F, Hennen J, Silk K . Mental health service utilization by borderline personality disorder patients and Axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for 6 years. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004; 65(1):28-36. DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0105. View

Cai L, Yang J, Hansen M . Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychol Methods. 2011; 16(3):221-48. PMC: 3150629. DOI: 10.1037/a0023350. View

10.

Bondurant H, Greenfield B, Tse S . Construct validity of the adolescent borderline personality disorder: a review. Can Child Adolesc Psychiatr Rev. 2008; 13(3):53-7. PMC: 2538734. View

11.

Crick N, Murray-Close D, Woods K . Borderline personality features in childhood: a short-term longitudinal study. Dev Psychopathol. 2006; 17(4):1051-70. View

12.

Steinberg L . The consequences of pairing questions: context effects in personality measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81(2):332-42. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.332. View

13.

Helzer J, Kraemer H, Krueger R . The feasibility and need for dimensional psychiatric diagnoses. Psychol Med. 2006; 36(12):1671-80. DOI: 10.1017/S003329170600821X. View

14.

Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C . The criterion validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in an adolescent inpatient setting. J Pers Disord. 2011; 25(4):492-503. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492. View

15.

Cai L, Maydeu-Olivares A, Coffman D, Thissen D . Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006; 59(Pt 1):173-94. DOI: 10.1348/000711005X66419. View

16.

Fraley R, Waller N, Brennan K . An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(2):350-65. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350. View

17.

Feske U, Kirisci L, Tarter R, Pilkonis P . An application of item response theory to the DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2007; 21(4):418-33. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.4.418. View

18.

Aggen S, Neale M, Roysamb E, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Kendler K . A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning. Psychol Med. 2009; 39(12):1967-78. PMC: 2844893. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291709005807. View

19.

Michonski J, Sharp C, Steinberg L, Zanarini M . An item response theory analysis of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria in a population-based sample of 11- to 12-year-old children. Personal Disord. 2012; 4(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1037/a0027948. View

20.

Gibbons R, Weiss D, Kupfer D, Frank E, Fagiolini A, Grochocinski V . Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatr Serv. 2008; 59(4):361-8. PMC: 2916927. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.4.361. View