A Psychometric Evaluation of the DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria: Age and Sex Moderation of Criterion Functioning

Overview

Journal Psychol Med

Publisher Cambridge University Press

Specialty Psychology

Date 2009 Apr 30

PMID 19400977

Citations 15

Authors

S H Aggen

M C Neale

E Roysamb

T Reichborn-Kjennerud

K S Kendler

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite its importance as a paradigmatic personality disorder, little is known about the measurement invariance of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder (BPD) criteria; that is, whether the criteria assess the disorder equivalently across different groups.

Method: BPD criteria were evaluated at interview in 2794 young adult Norwegian twins. Analyses, based on item-response modeling, were conducted to test for differential age and sex moderation of the individual BPD criteria characteristics given factor-level covariate effects.

Results: Confirmatory factor analytic results supported a unidimensional structure for the nine BPD criteria. Compared to males, females had a higher BPD factor mean, larger factor variance and there was a significant age by sex interaction on the factor mean. Strong differential sex and age by sex interaction effects were found for the 'impulsivity' criterion factor loading and threshold. Impulsivity related to the BPD factor poorly in young females but improved significantly in older females. Males reported more impulsivity compared to females and this difference increased with age. The 'affective instability' threshold was also moderated, with males reporting less than expected.

Conclusions: The results suggest the DSM-IV BPD 'impulsivity' and 'affective instability' criteria function differentially with respect to age and sex, with impulsivity being especially problematic. If verified, these findings have important implications for the interpretation of prior research with these criteria. These non-invariant age and sex effects may be identifying criteria-level expression features relevant to BPD nosology and etiology. Criterion functioning assessed using modern psychometric methods should be considered in the development of DSM-V.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneity of borderline personality disorder symptoms in help-seeking adolescents.

Cavelti M, Lerch S, Ghinea D, Fischer-Waldschmidt G, Resch F, Koenig J Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021; 8(1):9.

PMID: 33722308 PMC: 7958409. DOI: 10.1186/s40479-021-00147-9.

Adolescent suicide risk and experiences of dissociation in daily life.

Vine V, Victor S, Mohr H, Byrd A, Stepp S Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287:112870.

PMID: 32171125 PMC: 7983062. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112870.

The relation between epistemic trust and borderline pathology in an adolescent inpatient sample.

Orme W, Bowersox L, Vanwoerden S, Fonagy P, Sharp C Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019; 6:13.

PMID: 31485332 PMC: 6712815. DOI: 10.1186/s40479-019-0110-7.

Dating violence victimization and borderline personality pathology: Temporal associations from late adolescence to early adulthood.

Vanwoerden S, Leavitt J, Gallagher M, Temple J, Sharp C Personal Disord. 2019; 10(2):132-142.

PMID: 30829527 PMC: 6732254. DOI: 10.1037/per0000324.

Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children-11: Measurement invariance over time and across gender in a community sample of adolescents.

Vanwoerden S, Garey L, Ferguson T, Temple J, Sharp C Psychol Assess. 2018; 31(1):114-119.

PMID: 30080065 PMC: 6312464. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000640.

References

Lindsay K, Sankis L, Widiger T . Gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories. J Pers Disord. 2000; 14(3):218-32. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.218. View

Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

Flanagan E, Blashfield R . Gender bias in the diagnosis of personality disorders: the roles of base rates and social stereotypes. J Pers Disord. 2003; 17(5):431-46. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.17.5.431.22974. View

Taylor J, Reeves M . Structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms in a nonclinical sample. J Clin Psychol. 2007; 63(9):805-16. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20398. View

Feske U, Kirisci L, Tarter R, Pilkonis P . An application of item response theory to the DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2007; 21(4):418-33. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.4.418. View

Skodol A, Gunderson J, Pfohl B, Widiger T, Livesley W, Siever L . The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 51(12):936-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01324-0. View

Neale M, Aggen S, Maes H, Kubarych T, Schmitt J . Methodological issues in the assessment of substance use phenotypes. Addict Behav. 2006; 31(6):1010-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.047. View

Flora D, Curran P . An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(4):466-91. PMC: 3153362. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466. View

Torgersen S, KRINGLEN E, Cramer V . The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58(6):590-6. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.590. View

10.

Widiger T . Invited essay: sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 1998; 12(2):95-118. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.1998.12.2.95. View

11.

Stevenson J, Meares R, Comerford A . Diminished impulsivity in older patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 160(1):165-6. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.165. View

12.

Harris J, Magnus P, Tambs K . The Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel: a description of the sample and program of research. Twin Res. 2003; 5(5):415-23. DOI: 10.1375/136905202320906192. View

13.

Jane J, Oltmanns T, South S, Turkheimer E . Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007; 116(1):166-75. PMC: 4372614. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166. View

14.

Blais M, Hilsenroth M, Castlebury F . Content validity of the DSM-IV borderline and narcissistic personality disorder criteria sets. Compr Psychiatry. 1997; 38(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-440x(97)90050-x. View

15.

Trull T, Widiger T, Guthrie P . Categorical versus dimensional status of borderline personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990; 99(1):40-8. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.99.1.40. View

16.

Sanislow C, Grilo C, McGlashan T . Factor analysis of the DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder criteria in psychiatric inpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157(10):1629-33. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1629. View

17.

Rothschild L, Cleland C, Haslam N, Zimmerman M . A taxometric study of borderline personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(4):657-66. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.657. View

18.

Borsboom D . When does measurement invariance matter?. Med Care. 2006; 44(11 Suppl 3):S176-81. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245143.08679.cc. View

19.

Sanislow C, Grilo C, Morey L, Bender D, Skodol A, Gunderson J . Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(2):284-90. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.284. View

20.

Johansen M, Karterud S, Pedersen G, Gude T, Falkum E . An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM-IV construct. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004; 109(4):289-98. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0447.2003.00268.x. View