» Articles » PMID: 24586859

Nonword Repetition--a Clinical Marker for Specific Language Impairment in Swedish Associated with Parents' Language-related Problems

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 4
PMID 24586859
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

First, we explore the performance of nonword repetition (NWR) in children with specific language impairment (SLI) and typically developing children (TD) in order to investigate the accuracy of NWR as a clinical marker for SLI in Swedish-speaking school-age children. Second, we examine the relationship between NWR, family aggregation, and parental level of education in children with SLI. A sample of 61 children with SLI, and 86 children with TD, aged 8-12 years, were administered an NWR test. Family aggregation, measured as the prevalence of language and/or literacy problems (LLP) in parents of the children with SLI, was based on family history interviews. The sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition was analyzed in a binary logistic regression, cut-off values were established with ROC curves, and positive and negative likelihood ratios reported. Results from the present study show that NWR distinguishes well between Swedish-speaking school-children with and without SLI. We found 90.2% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity at a cut-off level of -2 standard deviations for binary scoring of nonwords. Differences between the SLI and TD groups showed large effect sizes for the two scoring measures binary (d = 2.11) and percent correct consonants (PCC) (d = 1.79). The children with SLI were split into two subgroups: those with no parents affected with LLP (n = 12), and those with one or both parents affected (n = 49). The subgroup consisting of affected parents had a significantly lower score on NWR binary (p = .037), and there was a great difference between the subgroups (d = 0.7). When compared to the TD group, the difference from the subgroup with affected parents was almost one standard deviation larger (d = 2.47) than the difference from the TD to the subgroup consisting of non-affected parents (d = 1.57). Our study calls for further exploration of the complex interaction between family aggregation, language input, and phenotypes of SLI.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and heritability of parental-reported speech and/or language difficulties in a Swedish population-based twin sample.

Keijser R, Asberg Johnels J, Habbe M, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, Lundstrom S JCPP Adv. 2024; 4(3):e12221.

PMID: 39411473 PMC: 11472810. DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12221.


Beyond Language Scores: How Language Exposure Informs Assessment of Nonword Repetition, Vocabulary and Narrative Macrostructure in Bilingual Turkish/Swedish Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder.

Oberg L, Bohnacker U Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929283 PMC: 11202042. DOI: 10.3390/children11060704.


Listening and Processing Skills in Young School Children with a History of Developmental Phonological Disorder.

Kalnak N, Nakeva von Mentzer C Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338244 PMC: 10855919. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030359.


Whole exome sequencing and polygenic assessment of a Swedish cohort with severe developmental language disorder.

Yahia A, Li D, Lejerkrans S, Rajagopalan S, Kalnak N, Tammimies K Hum Genet. 2024; 143(2):169-183.

PMID: 38300321 PMC: 10881898. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02636-z.


Under-resourced or overloaded? Rethinking working memory deficits in developmental language disorder.

Jones S, Westermann G Psychol Rev. 2022; 129(6):1358-1372.

PMID: 35482644 PMC: 9899422. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000338.


References
1.
Barry J, Yasin I, Bishop D . Heritable risk factors associated with language impairments. Genes Brain Behav. 2007; 6(1):66-76. PMC: 1974814. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00232.x. View

2.
Costanzo F, Varuzza C, Menghini D, Addona F, Gianesini T, Vicari S . Executive functions in intellectual disabilities: a comparison between Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34(5):1770-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.024. View

3.
Conti-Ramsden G, Botting N, Simkin Z, Knox E . Follow-up of children attending infant language units: outcomes at 11 years of age. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001; 36(2):207-19. View

4.
Tomblin J, Records N, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, OBrien M . Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 40(6):1245-60. PMC: 5075245. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4006.1245. View

5.
Lasky E, Klopp K . Parent-child interactions in normal and language-disordered children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982; 47(1):7-18. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4701.07. View